Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revisionBoth sides next revision
how_forests_think [2018-06-03 09:59] – created nikhow_forests_think [2018-06-03 10:00] nik
Line 113: Line 113:
 <blockquote>It is the product of the imponderable weight of the many dead that make a living future possible.</blockquote> <blockquote>It is the product of the imponderable weight of the many dead that make a living future possible.</blockquote>
  
-<blockquote>“selva selvaggia”+<blockquote>“selva selvaggia”</blockquote>
  
  
 ===1. The Open Whole=== ===1. The Open Whole===
  
-We need to provincialize language because we conflate representation with language and this conflation finds its way into our theory.</blockquote>+<blockquote>We need to provincialize language because we conflate representation with language and this conflation finds its way into our theory.</blockquote>
  
 <blockquote>Although not exactly a word, tsupu certainly is a sign</blockquote> <blockquote>Although not exactly a word, tsupu certainly is a sign</blockquote>
Line 203: Line 203:
 <blockquote>It is due to their privileged position relative to animals in the trans-species interpretive hierarchy that constitutes the forest ecology of selves that the Runa feel they can readily understand the meanings of canine vocalizations.19 Dogs, however, cannot, under normal circumstances, understand the full range of human speech. As I indicated earlier, if people want dogs to understand them they must give the dogs hallucinogenic drugs. That is, they must make their dogs into shamans so that they can traverse the boundaries that separate them from humans.</blockquote> <blockquote>It is due to their privileged position relative to animals in the trans-species interpretive hierarchy that constitutes the forest ecology of selves that the Runa feel they can readily understand the meanings of canine vocalizations.19 Dogs, however, cannot, under normal circumstances, understand the full range of human speech. As I indicated earlier, if people want dogs to understand them they must give the dogs hallucinogenic drugs. That is, they must make their dogs into shamans so that they can traverse the boundaries that separate them from humans.</blockquote>
  
-<blockquote>When advising their dogs people in Ávila address them directly but in the third person. This appears to be similar to the Spanish usted system whereby third-person grammatical constructions are used in second-person pragmatic contexts to communicate status. Quichua, however, lacks such a deferential system. Notwithstanding, the Runa tweak Quichua to improvise one.+<blockquote>When advising their dogs people in Ávila address them directly but in the third person. This appears to be similar to the Spanish usted system whereby third-person grammatical constructions are used in second-person pragmatic contexts to communicate status. Quichua, however, lacks such a deferential system. Notwithstanding, the Runa tweak Quichua to improvise one.</blockquote>
  
  • how_forests_think.txt
  • Last modified: 2022-01-02 11:26
  • by nik