✎ further_local_discussion_about_the_anthropocentric_jungle [the libarynth]

You've loaded an old revision of the document! If you save it, you will create a new version with this data.

====== Theun: ======

I disagree with much of this; in my opinion [[Ecosystem_gardening]] is much less anthropocentric than suggested here and has nothing to do with growing crops. The tribals we met in India, living in stone-age conditions, had little knowledge about plants beyond their use. Human pressures simply never were high enough to need any management. And lastly being in the rainforest for just a few weeks made me quiet sure that its metabolism is way beyond our capacity to prune and weed it. In fact you can't even keep it from invading your body. I'd like to add that research done by [[http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Smits|Willie Smits]] on Borneo has shown Orang-utans to use pruning and weeding and sowing.

====== Socialfiction Bot: ======

Thank you for looking at it, will try to clarify point by point:

**in my opinion [[Ecosystem_gardening]] is much less anthropocentric than suggested here and has nothing to do with growing crops.**

I am talking here specific about the Amazon and even though it is not orthodoxy yet, the long-lived idea that the Amazon is 'virgin' and pristine is being replaced with a view of the Amazon as a product of human history. This includes the native people who live from it but also the forest itself. I will make it myself easy here and just refer you to [[http://books.google.com/books?id=XnELAAAAYAAJ]] by Charles Mann which contains the best overview in print and cannot be recommended enough. 
What it breaks down is the hard distinction between gardening and foraging: foraging becomes, to a certain degree, time-lapse gardening. 
The [[Ecosystem_gardening]] page as it stand now is not really containing what it says.

**The tribals we met in India, living in stone-age conditions, had little knowledge about plants beyond their use.**

Nobody lives in a stone-age condition, it is an easy turn of phrase that is bordering on racism. The very fact that you were there (and they didn't eat you) is testament to this. The average European doesn't even know about the plants they do use. Indian Cuisine only became possible after the discovery of America. The often called stone-age people of the Amazon make their existence in a way that has been possible for 300 years at best. I am sure this is true for many other people in the world as well.

**Human pressures simply never were high enough to need any management.**

Again, talking specifically about the Amazon, populations were vast when the Euro-pigs first arrived there. This also connects with your next point.

**And lastly being in the rainforest for just a few weeks made me quiet sure that its metabolism is way beyond our capacity to prune and weed it. In fact you can't even keep it from invading your body.**

Obviously you can't control it like you control a field of grain or a rice paddy but humans (like all animals) are part of that eco-system and have, over time, the power to steer it into useful directions. It is hard to imagine how that actually works but there is plenty of evidence and pointers to suggest it.

This paper is an important entry point into the discussion: [[http://www.sas.upenn.edu/anthro/system/files/Erickson2006.pdf
]]

Please fill all the letters into the box to prove you're human. Please keep this field empty:

Edit summary

Note: By editing this page you agree to license your content under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International