Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- future_fabulators:confabulation [2014-02-05 02:18] – maja
+++ future_fabulators:confabulation [2014-02-06 00:17] – maja
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
   * can we use predictions to help separate/isolate important, predictable events within a "A Nonpredictive View of the World"? (cf. fragility -> robustness -> antifragility)
   * what is the question? can it be answered diceisively at a particualr point in the future? what is at stake? what are the consequences or impacts?
 ==== internal / irrational ====
   * divination / invocation
+==== present / future ====
+20140206 Having done several [[scenarios|scenario workshops]], it seems that the most powerful aspect of the process is the realisation that people usually live in multiple scenarios today - which makes them laugh in recognition, but also helps distill the issues very quickly. How 'futuristic' or accurate the scenario narratives end up being doesn't seem to matter so much. The realisation about their present situation already gives a sense of awareness what's going on and where they'd like to be. It makes the future more open or malleable in a way. So for us the question is how do we emphasise and support this renewed sense of agency? Prehearsals, scenario testing, 'how do we get from here to there' excercises are a good start, but more research is needed.
 ==== scenario database ====
-While editing [[scenarios]] on the libarynth it became apparent how tricky it is to keep a consistency in information and layout of the scenarios. The scenario database we're planning to make should make this easier. Components that seem to be needed in all scenarios:
+20140205 While editing [[scenarios]] on the libarynth it became apparent how tricky it is to keep a consistency in information and layout of the scenarios. The scenario database we're planning to make should make this easier. Components that seem to be needed in all scenarios:
   * what is the question?