Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
future_fabulators:confabulation [2014-02-11 07:05] majafuture_fabulators:confabulation [2014-02-12 01:39] maja
Line 12: Line 12:
 ==== internal / irrational ==== ==== internal / irrational ====
   * divination / invocation   * divination / invocation
 +
 +==== physical narratives ====
 +
 +  * Christine Wilks talking about text as a way for developing character depth; [[http://www.riders-project.net/research/videos/christine-wilks-taking-text-out-of-the-box.html]] (This probably belongs elsewhere, but...)
 +     * performing text on screen
 +     * Varytale  http://varytale.com
 +     * "Text becomes the equivalent of subtitles" - is this a good thing?
 +     * Very based around computer games.
 +     * "Character is a black box" - in PNs, we can only be based on interpretation based on behaviour and its artefacts, not on explicit exposure, unless we have things like "Dear Diary..."
 +     * Note: Prehearsals are first person narratives, PNs are third person. Thus a Prehearsal can have "more" introspection in some sense.
  
  
Line 50: Line 60:
   * how can we encourage an 'inquiring state of mind'?   * how can we encourage an 'inquiring state of mind'?
   * why does it seem more difficult to phrase questions rather than stating problems?   * why does it seem more difficult to phrase questions rather than stating problems?
 +
 +"In nearly all cases it should be possible to formulate the purpose of the scenarios work as a question. If this proves difficult, this is often an indication that the work will not be taken up when completed, even if it is of a good quality." -[[http://www.eisf.eu/resources/download.asp?d=5764|The Horizon Scanning Centre (pdf)]]
  
 Mapping the present situation Mapping the present situation
Line 69: Line 81:
   * how do we look at drivers as dynamic forces? should we be looking at responses to trends rather than trends in general? (nouns -> verbs)   * how do we look at drivers as dynamic forces? should we be looking at responses to trends rather than trends in general? (nouns -> verbs)
   * what are existing ways of discussing trends with groups of people?   * what are existing ways of discussing trends with groups of people?
 +    * [[horizon scanning]]
   * should we make our own STEEP cards to avoid the 'business bias'?   * should we make our own STEEP cards to avoid the 'business bias'?
   * are there other well understood methods to group trends other than the customary STEEP (in which cultural changes seem to be clumped in with social or political)?   * are there other well understood methods to group trends other than the customary STEEP (in which cultural changes seem to be clumped in with social or political)?
  • future_fabulators/confabulation.txt
  • Last modified: 2015-05-20 10:10
  • by nik