Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
future_fabulators:debrief_human_invasive_interaction [2014-02-10 06:30] – majafuture_fabulators:debrief_human_invasive_interaction [2014-02-10 06:34] (current) – maja
Line 20: Line 20:
   * the motivation was high and there is an urgency in resolving the core question   * the motivation was high and there is an urgency in resolving the core question
   * there was a prior agreement of what success criteria might be and a clear picture of the present situation   * there was a prior agreement of what success criteria might be and a clear picture of the present situation
-  * the introductory session (arrival, framing, icebreaker…) was done outside of the two hours (for about ~1/2 hour before +  * the introductory session (arrival, framing, icebreaker…) was done outside of the two hours (for about ~1/2 hour before the scenario workshop started) 
-  * there was a lunch planned for after the session, where the conversations kept evolving +  * there was a lunch after the session, where the conversations kept evolving 
-  * the afternoon session was building on the scenarios (using GROWTH method from Vali Lalioti)+  * the afternoon session was building on the scenarios (using GROWTH cards from Vali Lalioti)
   * there was one facilitator who prepared for one day beforehand   * there was one facilitator who prepared for one day beforehand
  
Line 31: Line 31:
   * For two facilitators who aren’t used to work together at least one full day of preparation is needed, with clear agreements about who does what when. The flow should be written out in detail and be easily accessible to both facilitators during the process.   * For two facilitators who aren’t used to work together at least one full day of preparation is needed, with clear agreements about who does what when. The flow should be written out in detail and be easily accessible to both facilitators during the process.
   * If one of the facilitators is less experienced but knows their strengths, s/he should do only what s/he is good at, without attempting to learn new skills in this fast paced format   * If one of the facilitators is less experienced but knows their strengths, s/he should do only what s/he is good at, without attempting to learn new skills in this fast paced format
-  * No questioning of the process, or discussion about how to do stuff should happen during the workshop. quick decision making is crucial as there is no time for doubts (better to ask forgiveness than permission in this case)+  * No questioning of the process, nor discussion about how to do stuff should happen during the workshop. quick decision making is crucial, as there is no time for doubts (better to ask forgiveness than permission in this case)
   * The person who is moderating the conversation should not be harvesting (recording) it. It’s better that one person writes and the other moderates, to make sure that everyone is sufficiently heard   * The person who is moderating the conversation should not be harvesting (recording) it. It’s better that one person writes and the other moderates, to make sure that everyone is sufficiently heard
-  * If at all possible, extend the workshop to 3 hours with at least 30mins beforehand for the people to meet each other and an hour of refreshments (lunch, tea, dinner…) and conversation after the workshop+  * If at all possible, extend the workshop to 3 hours with at least 30mins beforehand for the people to meet each other and an hour of refreshments (lunch, tea, dinner…) and some form of (facilitated) conversation after the workshop
  
  • future_fabulators/debrief_human_invasive_interaction.1392013812.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2014-02-10 06:30
  • by maja