Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
ict_art_connect [2014-05-12 10:15] – nik | ict_art_connect_2014 [2014-05-12 11:30] – nik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Maja Kuzmanovic from FoAM | Maja Kuzmanovic from FoAM | ||
- | Transcript of the talk on [[foam at ict art connect]]. | + | Transcript of the talk on [[foam_at_ict_art_connect]]. |
Svetlana from Black Cube collective | Svetlana from Black Cube collective | ||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
* what is the dialogue about giving away personal data | * what is the dialogue about giving away personal data | ||
* ' | * ' | ||
- | * www.dataethics.org | + | * http://www.dataethics.org |
Hacking choreography 2.0 | Hacking choreography 2.0 | ||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
* IOT - sensors separate from visualisation | * IOT - sensors separate from visualisation | ||
- | crowd control | + | KrowdKontrol |
* improv, creating decisions in the moment | * improv, creating decisions in the moment | ||
* crowds - how can you interact with the performance | * crowds - how can you interact with the performance | ||
Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Dr Camille Baker Brunel University | ||
+ | Summary of the project | ||
+ | * different matchmaking events, with different audiences and approaches | ||
+ | |||
+ | Themes that emerged from the project: | ||
+ | * need for infrastructure to support ICT&Art collaborations (collaborative centres, sustainable platforms, hubs, matchmaking events | ||
+ | * funding - more diversified and flexible | ||
+ | * open ended projects (as opposed to working towards a particular outcome) | ||
+ | * need for access - funding, domain specific information, | ||
+ | * sustainability and dissemination | ||
+ | * training | ||
+ | * communication & support | ||
+ | * transparency | ||
+ | * collaboration, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Lucas Evers Waag Society | ||
+ | Process, challenges and recommendations | ||
+ | * process from open calls to pilot projects | ||
+ | * diversity of projects | ||
+ | * challenges: time, developing confidence, learning the methodologies and language, financial restrictions, | ||
+ | * recommendations: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Marta Antonioni (Sigma Orionis), Svetlana Kondakova (Black Cube Collective), | ||
+ | |||
+ | Recommendations and legacy of the project | ||
+ | * engage artists in the whole process: art interrogating research questions | ||
+ | * frameworks to involve a large number of different stakeholders | ||
+ | * education | ||
+ | * identifying relevant meeting spots | ||
+ | * regional diversity… | ||
+ | * mentoring with mentors external to the project | ||
+ | * matchmaking worked very well, should continue. perhaps more targeted and have other disciplines except art & ICT | ||
+ | * languages: it is necessary to keep specialist languages (scientists must have a way to talk about deep details, artists look more at horizontal scanning, both need to find a way to talk to citizens) | ||
+ | * large mission - easy to get lost in, scientists can help with methodological rigour. the artists provide a large, long term vision that scientists might not dare to propose - a way not to stick to the brief. there should be an artist in every scientific project | ||
+ | |||
+ | Roger Torrenti (moderating a discussion) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * FP7: Creativity unit in CONNECT | ||
+ | * bringing engineers (and engineering to art schools | ||
+ | * how to bring the kind of thinking developed in art& | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === misc. & various === | ||
+ | * [[wp>The Two Cultures]] and [[http:// | ||
+ | * http:// | ||