Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
luminous:reader_2010 [2010-07-21 12:57] 83.101.5.51luminous:reader_2010 [2010-08-19 07:48] (current) – added pdf link nik
Line 1: Line 1:
-=== luminous green reader 2010 ===+==== luminous green reader 2010 ====
  
-expansions on the previous [[sampler]] and [[recommended reading]] pages...+expansions on the previous [[sampler]] and [[recommended reading]] pages... this is also available as a [[http://locust.fo.am/luminous-reader-2010.pdf|pdf]] for offline reading.
  
-Resilience is...  +==== To begin with... ==== 
-the ability to absorb disturbances, to be changed and then to re-organise and still have the same identity (retain the same basic structure and ways of functioning). It includes the ability to learn from the disturbance. A resilient system is forgiving of external shocks. As resilience declines the magnitude of a shock from which it cannot recover gets smaller and smaller. Resilience shifts attention from purely growth and efficiency to needed recovery and flexibility. Growth and efficiency alone can often lead ecological systems, businesses and societies into fragile rigidities, exposing them to turbulent transformation. Learning, recovery and flexibility open eyes to novelty and new worlds of opportunity. + 
 +Luminous Green is a series of gatherings about possible futures; about a human world, that is enlightened, imaginative, electrified and most importantly – living in a fertile symbiosis with the planetLuminous Green encourages transdisciplinary discussions and collaborations between people from all walks of life, including artists, designers, academics, activists, social entrepreneurs, economists and policy-makersThe objective is to spawn inspiring conversations, contacts and propositions using holistic methods for looking beyond (and beneath) conservation and sustainability. (...) While the complexity and the vastness of global issues may remain as abstract figures and threats, with occasional news reports of disasters in far-off lands, we remain collectively paralysed (or simply apathetic). In order to make necessary changes, cultivating a more illuminated culture, the various crises need to be dealt with simultaneously on a global (ecological) and a human (personal) scale. Changing cultures requires finding appropriate levels at which individual contributions can be most effective. Comparing this with permaculture, we could find social and cultural equivalents of guild gardening – where, while sustaining our individual selves, each of us performs functions that also contribute to the development of the guild as a whole. We perform complimentary, and often redundant actions on all levels. For example, people focused on global policy are involved in negotiating global treaties; computer enthusiasts are putting together initiatives such as AMEE, DIY Kyoto or pachube; designers are reinventing products as sustainable services; manufacturers are sharing information about their supply chain inspired by Open Source. While all of these are laudable pursuits, not one could succeed in isolation. Across cultures and disciplines, we learn and borrow from each other, refine, adapt and transform solutions as required. We can then apply them in domains that are close to us, that we experience on a daily basis. In other words, they become living and lived solutions. They are reused, reduced and recycled through direct human experiences, becoming more robust and resilient through each iteration
 +http://lib.fo.am/luminous_green_mediated_environments 
 + 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +Even though it's clearly impossible and intellectually fraudulent in some strict sense, *somebody* ought to “predict the future.” I mean, not just do demographic models and some dry corporate trend forecasting, but actually wrap the future up in a big-picture package and sprinkle some Tinker Bell dust. That job really needs doing. -Bruce Sterling 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +If one fathoms deeply one's own neighbourhood and the everyday world in which he lives, the greatest of worlds will be revealed. -Masanobu Fukuoka  
 + 
 +----  
 + 
 +Our present global crisis is more profound than any previous historical crises; hence our solutions must be equally drastic. I propose that we should adopt the plant as the organizational model for life in the 21st century, just as the computer seems to be the dominant mental/social model of the late twentieth century, and the steam engine was the guiding image of the nineteenth century.  
 +http://lib.fo.am/plan_plant_planet 
 + 
 +==== On resilience ==== 
 + 
 +Resilience is the ability to absorb disturbances, to be changed and then to re-organise and still have the same identity (retain the same basic structure and ways of functioning). It includes the ability to learn from the disturbance. A resilient system is forgiving of external shocks. As resilience declines the magnitude of a shock from which it cannot recover gets smaller and smaller. Resilience shifts attention from purely growth and efficiency to needed recovery and flexibility. Growth and efficiency alone can often lead ecological systems, businesses and societies into fragile rigidities, exposing them to turbulent transformation. Learning, recovery and flexibility open eyes to novelty and new worlds of opportunity. 
 key concepts of resilience  key concepts of resilience 
 http://www.resalliance.org/564.php  http://www.resalliance.org/564.php 
  
 +----
  
-Resilience theory, first introduced by Canadian ecologist C.S. “Buzz” Holling in 1973, begins with two radical premises. The first is that humans and nature are strongly coupled and co-evolving, and should therefore be conceived of as one “social-ecological” system. The second is that the long-held assumption that systems respond to change in a linearpredictable fashion is simply wrong. According to resilience thinking, systems are in constant flux; they are highly unpredictable and self-organizing, with feedbacks across time and space. In the jargon of theorists, they are complex adaptive systems, exhibiting the hallmarks of complexity. +"The greatest glory is not in never fallingbut in rising every time we fall.-Confucius 
-A key feature of complex adaptive systems is that they can settle into a number of different equilibria. A lake, for example, will stabilize in either an oxygen-rich, clear state or algae-dominated, murky one. A financial market can float on a housing bubble or settle into a basin of recession. Historically, we’ve tended to view the transition between such states as gradualBut there is increasing evidence that systems often don’t respond to change that way: The clear lake seems hardly affected by fertilizer runoff until a critical threshold is passed, at which point the water abruptly goes turbid.  +
-Resilience science focuses on these sorts of tipping points. It looks at gradual stresses, such as climate change, as well as chance events—things like storms, fires, even stock market crashes—that can tip a system into another equilibrium state from which it is difficult, if not impossible, to recover. How much shock can a system absorb before it transforms into something fundamentally different? That, in a nutshell, is the essence of resilience.  +
-The concept of resilience upends old ideas about “sustainability”: Instead of embracing stasis, resilience emphasizes volatility, flexibility, and de-centralization. Change, from a resilience perspective, has the potential to create opportunity for development, novelty, and innovation. As Holling himself once put it, there is “no sacred balance” in nature. “That is a very dangerous idea.” +
-Over the past decade, resilience science has expanded beyond the founding group of ecologists to include economists, political scientists, mathematicians, social scientists, and archaeologists. And they have made remarkable progress in studying how habitats—including coral reefs, lakes, wetlands, forests, and irrigation systems, among others—absorb disturbance while continuing to function.  +
-New Orleans, however, presents an interesting example to resilience scientists. If a lake can shift from clear to murky, could a city shift to a dramatically different stable state too? If biodiversity in ecosystems makes them resilient to disturbance, could diversity in urban systems serve a similar purpose? “Cities aren’t dominated by nature to the same extent as things like lakes and wetlands and coral reefs,” says Australian ecologist Brian Walker, “But we wondered, could we look at them in the same way?” +
-… +
-In short, cities are the quintessential complex adaptive system. Which makes them, in many ways, the perfect place to explore resilience. +
-“As humans, we should try to understand how to manage systems in order to avoid passing thresholds,” says Elmqvist [lead researcher of the “Urban Network”]. But this is especially difficult in urban contexts, which have already been so transformed by humans that they’ve breached most of the thresholds ecologists are familiar with. When great expanses of concrete and steel now exist where trees and streams once did, new tipping points must be defined for places that are, as Elmqvist puts it, “already tipped.” +
  
-A city’s lifeblood is a continuous flow of stuff—fuelconsumer products, people, and services that enter it either activelythrough human effort, or passively through natural processes like solar radiationatmospheric currents, and precipitationEcologists often talk about these resource flows in terms of inputs and outputsThey’ve developed several budgetary models of accounting for themincluding the well-known “ecological footprint.”  +---- 
-The resilience approachaccording to ecologist Guy Barnett of the Urban Network’s Canberra research teamfocuses less on the resources that cities consume and more on the interdependencies along the chain of supply and demand. Dependence on a single type of fuel as an energy sourcefor instancecreates highly vulnerable system—especially if fuel prices are volatile or if the supply is prone to disruption+ 
-Consider what happened just outside of Melbourne in 1998Several explosions at Esso Australia’s natural gas plant there killed two people and halted power supply to the city for nearly two weeksAs a result, the regional dairy industrywhich relies on natural gas to power its milk pasteurizationwas forced to shut down several of its plantsSome 25 million liters of raw milk went to waste. +Resilience theory, first introduced by Canadian ecologist C.S. “Buzz” Holling in 1973, begins with two radical premises. The first is that humans and nature are strongly coupled and co-evolving, and should therefore be conceived of as one “social-ecological” system. (...) According to resilience thinkingsystems are in constant flux; they are highly unpredictable and self-organizingwith feedbacks across time and space. (...) A key feature of complex adaptive systems is that they can settle into a number of different equilibria. A lake, for example, will stabilize in either an oxygen-richclear state or algae-dominatedmurky one. A financial market can float on a housing bubble or settle into a basin of recession. Historicallywe’ve tended to view the transition between such states as gradualBut there is increasing evidence that systems often don’t respond to change that way: The clear lake seems hardly affected by fertilizer runoff until a critical threshold is passed, at which point the water abruptly goes turbid. (...) How much shock can a system absorb before it transforms into something fundamentally different? That, in a nutshell, is the essence of resilienceThe concept of resilience upends old ideas about “sustainability”: Instead of embracing stasisresilience emphasizes volatility, flexibility, and de-centralizationChange, from a resilience perspectivehas the potential to create opportunity for development, novelty, and innovation. (...) Urban resilience calls attention to the ecosystem services within cities themselves, to the medley of blue and green spacesboth natural and man-madethat can buffer city against change.  
-Take water, an essential resource for every city—and therefore chronic source of concern for city managers without an ample supplyAn efficient way of getting more would be to tap into groundwater; wealthy cities might even import water from afarThe more resilient approach, according to Elmqvist, would be for city managers to consider the dynamics of the larger watershedThey could negotiate agreements with rural landownerspaying them to manage their property in a way that provides the city with a certain amount and certain quality of water+http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/urban_resilience/ 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +The problem is we are not ever going to return to our original shape or position. There are philosophical reasons for this: you can’t step in the same river twice. There are practical reasons for this: technology and politics are constant change, and technology produces all kinds of accelerationBut, simply, the futurewhatever it isgood or bad, is not going to look like the pastResilience is a comforting conceptIt says “you can take a licking and keep on ticking.” It says “you will recover and restore your original shape after crisis.” It’s fundamentally nostalgicYou wish for the way things were, and you put things back that way after the storm has passedMy friendsthe storm is not going to pass. The storm is called life. We want systems which do not suffer from cascading failures. We want systems which keep working through trouble. We want systems which are easy to fix when they break. But we want systems that aggressively and relentlessly adapt to their environments – good and bad – and any opportunity to prosper therein, not just systems that can recover from being whacked. Resilience is passive. We need to move beyond it before the concept gets too dug in 
 +http://vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/global/why-its-not-resilience-1366 
 + 
 +----
  
-On the coral reefs around Jamaica, a variety of fish once helped keep algae firmly in check. When intensive harvesting eliminated many of these algae-grazers, long-spined sea urchins took over that niche—and the urchins’ numbers exploded with less competition for food. But then a one-two punch of a bacterial pathogen and a hurricane devastated the urchin population, and algae growth surged, strangling the coral. A coral-dominated system abruptly shifted into a state of algal-dominance. 
-Abundant biodiversity is critical, as most people know, because it means being able to fill the numerous niches of a healthy ecosystem. But it also increases the odds that some of those species, like fish and urchins, will share niches and have overlapping roles in the ecosystem. This redundancy can help a system absorb disturbance—or when it’s lost, make it vulnerable to attack. In the case of the Jamaican reefs, an infection or storm that might once have been easily surmountable suddenly become lethal. 
-When it comes to human populations, ecologists are hesitant to stretch metaphors too far—a biodiverse ecosystem is not the same as a diverse population. (After all, says Elmqvist, a very heterogeneous society can also mean a lot of conflict). On the other hand, he says, a good analogy can be drawn to ecosystem redundancy.  
- 
-When a mysterious ailment known as Colony Collapse Disorder decimated honeybee populations across the US in 2007, threatening a $14 billion fruit and nut industry, it became painfully apparent just how valuable the pollination services of this single winged species are. Similarly, the large-scale destruction of tropical rain forests has called attention to their invaluable role as living carbon sinks.  
-Urban resilience calls attention to the ecosystem services within cities themselves, to the medley of blue and green spaces, both natural and man-made, that can buffer a city against change. Things like urban parks, green roofs, community gardens, and coastal wetlands perform numerous functions, from cooling the city’s microclimate to purifying its rainwater to serving as built-in flood control.  
-In New Orleans, for example, more than 60 percent of wetlands have been lost in the last 60 years, due partly to oil and natural gas exploration and partly to the levies that were built to keep the Mississippi from flooding the city. Ironically, the loss of these wetlands contributed very directly to the disastrous effects of Hurricane Katrina. Researchers have since calculated that restoring 1 kilometer of wetland would reduce the wave height by one meter, and now efforts are underway to begin rebuilding the southern Louisiana coastline.  
- 
-No city today could survive on its own resources. This goes for energy, water, food, information, and various other inputs that fuel urban activity. But it also holds true for governance, as evidenced by the network of cities that is becoming increasingly prominent in the global policy arena. 
-As urban areas grow in size and complexity, they are catalyzing a shift in power: Increasingly, it is cities—financial centers, hubs of innovation and human capital—that are driving the agenda. This has happened in the US, for example, as cities that took the lead in instituting climate policies after the Bush Administration showed no initiative in doing so. At last year’s annual conference of Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)—the world’s principle legally binding international treaty to protect biodiversity—more than 50 cities said that they wanted to be a part of implementing its agenda. 
- 
-“We are going into a very interesting new era when it comes to global governance,” says Elmqvist. “We will have nation states, but we will also have very powerful cities raising their voices about the future and the nature of sustainable development.” 
-... 
 At the outset of 2010, volatility is the watchword of the day. Some things are certain: economies will grow, greenhouse gases will accumulate, more people will be born than will die across the planet. But how exactly consumption, climate, population, and other factors will interact is anyone’s guess. In that context, when risk and uncertainty are inevitable, providing the capacity to absorb change—building for resilience—is the only rational response.  At the outset of 2010, volatility is the watchword of the day. Some things are certain: economies will grow, greenhouse gases will accumulate, more people will be born than will die across the planet. But how exactly consumption, climate, population, and other factors will interact is anyone’s guess. In that context, when risk and uncertainty are inevitable, providing the capacity to absorb change—building for resilience—is the only rational response. 
-Urban Resilience  
-Frontier / by Maywa Montenegro / February 16, 2010, Seed Magazine 
 http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/urban_resilience/ http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/urban_resilience/
  
 +==== From a birds eye view... ====
  
  
-"The greatest glory is not in never fallingbut in rising every time we fall."  +“Working for the earth is not a way to get richit is a way to be rich.” -Paul Hawken
-Confucius +
  
 +----
  
 +The accelerating crisis in climate change and the realization that humans are the primary cause of this change has raised questions about ownership and responsibility. Who ‘owns’ the climate change crisis and who is responsible for mitigating and reversing it if possible? The overwhelming response to these questions by governments internationally has been to propose a market solution—in essence, to sell the atmosphere. http://lib.fo.am/luminous/who_owns_the_air
  
-The problem is we are not ever going to return to our original shape or position. There are philosophical reasons for this: you can’t step in the same river twice. There are practical reasons for this: technology and politics are constant change, and technology produces all kinds of acceleration. But, simply, the future, whatever it is, good or bad, is not going to look like the past. +----
  
-Resilience is a comforting concept. It says “you can take a licking and keep on ticking.” It says “you will recover and restore your original shape after crisis.” It’s fundamentally nostalgicYou wish for the way things were, and you put things back that way after the storm has passed+"The problem is, the children of 2050 will look at that future world, with all its problems, and see home: and they'll look at the choices they have in front of them, and see the futureAnd since the choices we make in the next forty years will decide what choices our descendants are left with -- a thriving society engaged in centuries of restoration and planetary repair, or gradual desperate retreat towards the poles -- giving up now because we don't like the choice set we face is pathetic cowardice(...) We need millions of people ready to put the future back in the room. We need millions of people ready to demand that their governments, their companies, their communities and their cultural institutions confront the reality of the futures they make every day.   
 +http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/011102.html 
  
-My friends, the storm is not going to pass. The storm is called life. We want systems which do not suffer from cascading failures. We want systems which keep working through trouble. We want systems which are easy to fix when they break. +----
  
-But we want systems that aggressively and relentlessly adapt to their environments – good and bad – and any opportunity to prosper thereinnot just systems that can recover from being whacked.  +“We are going into a very interesting new era when it comes to global governance,” says ElmqvistWe will have nation states, but we will also have very powerful cities raising their voices about the future and the nature of sustainable development. 
-Resilience is passive. We need to move beyond it before the concept gets too dug in.  +http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/urban_resilience/
-http://vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/global/why-its-not-resilience-1366+
  
 +----
  
-  +"Providing and producing public goods and common-pool resources at local, regional, national and international levels require different institutions than open, competitive markets or highly centralized governmental institutions. If we are to solve collective-action problems effectively we must rethink the way we approach market and governmental institutions. We need analytical approaches that are consistent with a public sector that encourages human development at multiple levels. This chapter reviews studies of polycentric governance systems in metropolitan areas and for managing common-pool resources. (...) A fundamental set of problems facing individuals in all developed and developing societies are collective-action problems. The size and shape of these problems however differ dramatically. Polycentricity may help solve collective-action problems by developing systems of governmental and nongovernmental organizations at multiple scales. "After an introduction to the problem, this chapter will review the extensive research that demonstrated the capabilities of many citizens to design imaginative and productive ways of producing public goods and common-pool resources. Successful systems tend to be polycentric with small units nested in larger systems.  
-Herman Koëter the former chairman of the EU agency for food-safety EFSA and the OESO says in a Dutch Newspaper today that Europe is still dumping low quality food and still exports insecticides like DDT to Africa. For instance: fish with too much dioxin or mercury is regularly exported.  +http://en.scientificcommons.org/38388982 
-The Brussels based non-profit Orange House Partnership attempts to train regulators in Afrika, China and other non-western countries, in knowledge about foodsafety issues and about chemicals in food-chains. This should allow them to be less vulnerable to the sales-pitches delivered by Western companies and to improve the quality of their own produce. +http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/handle/10535/4417 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +Things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler. -Albert Einstein  
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +Nature is gone. It was gone before you were born, before your parents were born, before the pilgrims arrived, before the pyramids were built. You are living on a used planet. If this bothers you, get over it. We now live in the Anthropocene ― a geological epoch in which Earth’s atmosphere, lithosphere and biosphere are shaped primarily by human forces.  
 +http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/05/ftf-ellis-1/#more-3996#ixzz0uDUF41HX  
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +Change in Numbers [anfischer.com] is an informative extension of an existing public display that features the actual ambient temperature in the city. The additional display calculates and shows the difference in temperature to historical statistical weather data of the past. In this case, the display calculated the difference of the month February to the same month about 50 years ago. By doing this, it aims to raise the public awareness of anthropomorphic global warming.  
 +http://infosthetics.com/archives/2009/03/change_in_numbers_global_warming_warning_display.html  
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +Much of the current thinking about the sustainability of our lifestyles is predominantly future focused – in 2020, by 2050, in 5, 15 or 50 years – things will change for the better (according to neo-liberal optimism), or for the worse (according to some scientific projections, or deep green pessimism). In the mean time, the future has arrived and begun to unravel into the past, quietly and unnoticed. In the rush to predict or change the future, we all too easily neglect the present, the only time in which we can actually influence and exercise our possible futures. By becoming more consciously present in the 'here-and-now', we can begin to discern a continuous string of present moments stretching into the mythical 'long term'. We cannot sacrifice the present for an unattainable future, yet we cannot retreat into an 'innocent' past which spawned our present problems. So, the question becomes; what can we do to live more fully in the present, work toward a more luminous future, while drawing inspiration from the past? http://lib.fo.am/luminous_green_mediated_environments 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +The benefits of future predictions may be more in thinking in the larger scope/scale than in the accuracy of any one prediction. This is like the idea that planning is worthwhile even if a specific plan need to be taken with a significant quantity of salt. -Bruce Sterling  
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +Johan Rockström, Director of the Stockholm Resilience Centre warns that transgressing planetary boundaries may be devastating for humanity, but if we respect them we have a bright future for centuries ahead. Nine boundaries identified were climate change, stratospheric ozone, land use change, freshwater use, biological diversity, ocean acidification, nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to the biosphere and oceans, aerosol loading and chemical pollution. The study suggests that three of these boundaries (climate change, biological diversity and nitrogen input to the biosphere) may already have been transgressed. In addition, it emphasizes that the boundaries are strongly connected — crossing one boundary may seriously threaten the ability to stay within safe levels of the others. 
 +http://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/researchnews/tippingtowardstheunknown.5.7cf9c5aa121e17bab42800021543.html 
 +Podcast on planetary boundaries: http://www.nature.com/nature/podcast/index-2009-09-24.html 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +"Climateprediction.net is a distributed computing project to produce predictions of the Earth's climate up to 2100 and to test the accuracy of climate models. To do this, we need people around the world to give us time on their computers - time when they have their computers switched on, but are not using them to their full capacity." 
 +http://climateprediction.net/ 
 + 
 +==== Power shifts ==== 
 + 
 + 
 +Stewart Brand built his case for rethinking environmental goals and methods on two major changes going on in the world. The one that most people  still don't take into consideration is that power is shifting to the developing world, where 5 out of 6 people live, where the bulk of humanity is getting out of poverty by moving to cities and creating their own jobs and communities (slums, for now).  
 +http://www.longnow.org/seminars/02009/oct/09/rethinking-green/  
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +In all hon­esty and bold­ness I think we (the Devel­op­ing World) have grown accus­tomed to the top help­ing the bot­tom and because of that we’ve grown lazy. We don’t even think things can be both ways. We can help them! I believe there is a need to re-educate our­selves as devel­op­ing coun­tries and gain agency. Let’s clean the mess in our rooms after we play; our rooms being the whole world. Fur­ther­more, the prob­lems the First World is hav­ing are and should be our con­cern as well, after all that is where we are head­ing. We’ve  cre­ated a cul­ture that relies on aid and we (and them) often dis­card our respon­si­bil­ity in improv­ing our present con­di­tions and shap­ing a bet­ter future. True, there’s a lot on our plate (prob­lems, that is), but there are enough inspir­ing indi­vid­u­als in our com­mu­ni­ties that have stood up and made a dif­fer­ence. It’s time to fol­low their exam­ple and wake up (per­haps in reverse order). Not only are we capa­ble of pro­vid­ing sig­nif­i­cant con­tri­bu­tions to cre­ate a bet­ter and more sus­tain­able soci­ety in both the devel­oped and the devel­op­ing worlds, it is our respon­si­bil­ity as inhab­i­tants of this planet. 
 +Dx1W  - http://designforthefirstworld.com/ 
 +The Ghana ThinkTank - http://www.ghanathinktank.org/ 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +The Barefoot college in Rajasthan, India is a unique place, run by unique people. It is rooted in tradition, with a vision that reaches far into the future. It is an embodiment of Gandhi’s philosophy – a place where education is distinct from literacy, where women flourish, children run a parliament, and people with handicaps are not disabled. On Barefoot campuses there is no waste, water is harvested and sunlight turned into power (literally and metaphorically). In Barefoot campus programmes traditional crafts meet information technologies, while environmental and ethical sustainability are at the core of everyday life. http://lib.fo.am/luminous/kuzmanovic_shankar_barefoot_college 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +Frugal life, mother, simple life, conservation, recycling, raw materials, essence, substance, fulfilling, elegance, mindset change, highest output and lowest input, fragility, using less, participation framework, 21st century cradle-to-cradle, impermanence, autonomy, scale… http://lib.fo.am/luminous/nandi_fragile_frugality 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +Sometime later, The bomb craters, Made good fish ponds -Michael Filimowicz 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +Herman Koëter the former chairman of the EU agency for food-safety EFSA and the OESO says in a Dutch Newspaper today that Europe is still dumping low quality food and still exports insecticides like DDT to Africa. For instance: fish with too much dioxin or mercury is regularly exported. The Brussels based non-profit Orange House Partnership attempts to train regulators in Afrika, China and other non-western countries, in knowledge about food safety issues and about chemicals in food-chains. This should allow them to be less vulnerable to the sales-pitches delivered by Western companies and to improve the quality of their own produce. 
 article in dutch: http://tinyurl.com/2anotlf  article in dutch: http://tinyurl.com/2anotlf 
  
 +----
  
-"The problem is, the children of 2050 will look at that future world, with all its problems, and see home: and they'll look at the choices they have in front of them, and see the futureAnd since the choices we make in the next forty years will decide what choices our descendants are left with -- thriving society engaged in centuries of restoration and planetary repair, or a gradual desperate retreat towards the poles -- giving up now because we don't like the choice set we face is pathetic cowardice.+Today I witnessed a municipality truck with five officials in South Delhipicking up vendor carts at random. They took away the utensils and the stock. Other officials decided to use their sticks to beat up vendors and break their eggs. They finally drove away with apparent glee. I had been acquainted for several weeks with one of the vendors they attacked. (…) Meanwhilemy vendor is back the next morning. I am impressed and inquire how many times this has happened, and he says with defiance, “three times in the last two months.” (…) The cart is from his friend, a fresh juice vendor. The fresh juice business is not very popular in winters. There are no eggs today since all were broken in the clash. I am told that the eggs will arrive soon. Meanwhile he lights fire with the waste paper lying around to warm up the place for everyone. http://lib.fo.am/luminous/shankar_where_is_my_chai
  
-Human beings make the future every day. Making the future -- setting in motion future events -- might almost be considered part of the definition of humanity. The problem is that today, when powerful men sit down and make decisions, they generally make those decisions as if the future didn't exist, as if the consequences of their actions were beyond anticipationas if they bore no responsibility for foresight. The future's not welcome in the room. +==== Foodfuel & energy in a technological world ==== 
  
-We need millions of people ready to put the future back in the roomWe need millions of people ready to demand that their governmentstheir companiestheir communities and their cultural institutions confront the reality of the futures they make every day +You are going to have to figure out what it means to be a human being on earth at a time when every living system is declining, and the rate of decline is acceleratingKind of a mind-boggling situation… but not one peer-reviewed paper published in the last thirty years can refute that statement. Basicallycivilization needs a new operating system, you are the programmers, and we need it within a few decades." (...) The most unrealistic person in the world is the cynic, not the dreamer. Hope only makes sense when it doesn’t make sense to be hopeful. This is your century. Take it and run as if your life depends on it
-Alex Steffen,  +http://globalmindshift.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/the-unforgettable-commencement-address-by-paul-hawken-to-the-class-of-2009-university-of-portland-may-3-2009/
-http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/011102.html +
  
 +----
 +
 +The possibility of marrying craft with computerisation, past with present with future, the tacit with the virtual, contains the seeds of a new way of apprehending our relationship to all of these fields, inclusive as much as it is combinatory. http://lib.fo.am/luminous/craft_after_virtuality
 +
 +----
 +
 +We propose that the current climate of industrialized destruction be countered by industrialized reseeding of the oceans. Our work particularly examines the technologies that should exist to carry out this wish. The primary idea we are researching is the construct Bio Ocean Balls (BOBs). Consisting of a mass of larvae from micro to macro sized organisms, BOBs are released into the marine environment where they melt and disperse. This influx of biodiversity into once sterile areas rapidly creates a complete ecosystem. http://lib.fo.am/luminous/bobs
 +
 +----
 +
 +Green aversion to technologies such as nuclear and genetic engineering resulted from a mistaken notion that they are somehow unnatural. "What we call natural and what we call human are inseparable," Brand  concluded. "We live one life." 
 +http://www.longnow.org/seminars/02009/oct/09/rethinking-green/ 
 +Recommended reading from the Whole Earth Discipline by Stuart Brand: http://www.sbnotes.com 
 +
 +----
 +
 +"Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste [...] the waste produced by coal plants is actually more radioactive than that generated by their nuclear counterparts. In fact, the fly ash emitted by a power plant—a by-product from burning coal for electricity—carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy."
 +http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste
 +
 +----
 +
 +According to the US Department of Energy (Energy Information Administration), the world consumption of energy in all of its forms (barrels of petroleum, cubic meters of natural gas, watts of hydro power, etc.) is projected to reach 678 quadrillion Btu (or 7.15 exajoules) by 2030 – a 44% increase over 2008 levels (levels for 1980 were 283 quadrillion Btu and we stand at around 500 quadrillion Btu today). According to the United Nations 170,000 square kilometers of forest is destroyed each year. If we constructed solar farms at the same rate, we would be finished in 3 years. There are 1.2 million square kilometers of farmland in China. This is 2 1/2 times the area of solar farm required to power the world in 2030. The Saharan  Desert is 9,064,958 square kilometers, or 18 times the total required area to fuel the world. The typical golf course covers about a square kilometer. We have 40,000 of them around the world being meticulously maintained. If the same could be said for solar farms we would be almost 10% of the way there. 
 +http://www.landartgenerator.org/blagi/archives/127 
 +
 +----
 +
 +Nanosolar (http://Nanosolar.com/) are thin film solar panels with a production cost of $0.30 per watt (vs. $2.30 per watt for normal panels). Now here’s the interesting part. Their machinery costs 160 million dollars for a machine which can make a gigawatt of panels per year. Capital cost for a 1 watt of panels printed each year is $0.16 in other words.
 +http://vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/other/three-reasons-for-hope-energy-fuel-and-food-1797
 +
 +----
 +
 +The European Union is backing projects to turn the plentiful sunlight in the Sahara desert into electricity for power-hungry Europe, a scheme it hopes will help meet its target of deriving 20 percent of its energy from renewable sources in 2020. [...] initial volumes would come from small pilot projects, but the amount of electricity would go up into the thousands of megawatts as projects including the 400 billion euro Desertec solar scheme come on stream.
 +http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65J1ZO20100620
 +
 +----
  
 Purple Pokeberries and Fiber Could Provide Low-Cost Solar for Developing Nations  Purple Pokeberries and Fiber Could Provide Low-Cost Solar for Developing Nations 
Line 79: Line 183:
 http://inhabitat.com/2010/04/30/purple-pokeberries-could-help-provide-low-cost-solar-for-developing-nations/  http://inhabitat.com/2010/04/30/purple-pokeberries-could-help-provide-low-cost-solar-for-developing-nations/ 
  
 +----
  
-"A dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC, DSC or DYSC[1]) is a relatively new  +Fuel - (1) Algal Turf Scrubber (http://www.algalturfscrubber.com/): You know the thick, hairy stuff that grows on stones in rivers? That’s an algal turf. They grow in seawater too. And most of the complexity of harvesting algae is separating single cell critters from the water that surrounds them, where as turfs you harvest with snowplough type blade. Turfs are multi-speciesand include multicellular critters – they’re a complete ecosystem. Bonuses are two: firstly, you can grow them open tank and anything that drifts in becomes part of the mix. Second the lipid content of the turfs goes up with time as you get more and more little predators and such like which are just made of lovely, crunchy oils(2) Biobutanol (http://www.biobutanol.com/): This is a bit more complicatedNutshell version: ethanol is horrible for engines, pipelines and so on. Butanol is vastly better behaved. 
-class of low-cost solar cell, that belong to the group of thin film  +Note the possibility of running 100% butanol in an unmodified or slightly tweaked gasoline engine. Now that is still being worked on, but the energy density and lack of corrosion problems seen with ethanol are *very* promising
-solar cells.[2] It is based on semiconductor formed between a  +http://vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/other/three-reasons-for-hope-energy-fuel-and-food-1797
-photo-sensitized anode and an electrolyte, a photoelectrochemical  +
-systemThis cell was invented by Michael Grätzel and Brian O'Regan at  +
-the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in 1991[3] and are also  +
-known as Grätzel cells. +
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dye-sensitized_solar_cell +
  
 +----
  
 +We could be generating huge amounts of power from sewage. The process is fairly simple — just ferment sewage to produce a fuel called biogas. Biogas is almost entirely methane, and so is natural gas, so the two are essential interchangeable. The potential to produce biogas is almost entirely overlooked by most countries — except Sweden. In Sweden, 25% of all energy use is derived from biomass.
 +http://www.metaefficient.com/buses/biogas-sweden-fuel-buses-trains.html
  
-Change in Numbers [anfischer.com] is an informative extension of an existing public display that features the actual ambient temperature in the city. The additional display calculates and shows the difference in temperature to historical statistical weather data of the past. In this case, the display calculated the difference of the month February to the same month about 50 years ago. By doing this, it aims to raise the public awareness of anthropomorphic global warming.  +----
-http://infosthetics.com/archives/2009/03/change_in_numbers_global_warming_warning_display.html +
  
 +Can etherialness be a feature of cooking? (…) It refers to the immediacy of service required for a dish that has been put together for rapid consumption, as because of its very nature it only lasts a few seconds... – El Bulli Books 2003
  
 +----
 +
 +Permaculture design principles: 
 +  *[1] Observe and interact; beauty is in the eye of the beholder
 +  *[2] Catch and store energy; make hay while the sun shines
 +  *[3] Obtain a yield; you can't work on an empty stomach
 +  *[4] Apply self regulation and accept feedback; The sins of the fathers are visited on the children unto the seventh generation
 +  *[5] Use and value renewable resources and services; let nature take its course
 +  *[6] Produce no waste; a stitch in time saves nine / Waste not, want not
 +  *[7] Design from patterns to details; can't see the wood for the trees
 +  *[8] Integrate rather than segregate; many hands make light work
 +  *[9] Use small and slow solutions; the bigger they are, the harder they fall
 +  *[10] Use and value diversity; don't put all your eggs in one basket
 +  *[11] Use edges and value the marginal; don't think you're on the right track just because it is a well beaten path
 +  *[12] Creatively use and respond to change; vision is not seeing things as they are, but as they will be. -David Holmgren
 +
 +----
 +
 +One Acre Fund (http://oneacrefund.org/): 12,000 farms in Africa. One year training program, kind of like health visitors but for farming. For a year they come to your farm, visit, and teach you things. Cost per farm $100 or so, taken as a loan by the farmers. http://www.foodfirst.org/pubs/policybs/pb4.html#productivity
 +http://vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/other/three-reasons-for-hope-energy-fuel-and-food-1797
 +
 +----
  
-Mowing with goats 5/01/2009 09:32:00 AM  
 At our Mountain View headquarters, we have some fields that we need to mow occasionally to clear weeds and brush to reduce fire hazard. This spring we decided to take a low-carbon approach: Instead of using noisy mowers that run on gasoline and pollute the air, we've rented some goats from California Grazing to do the job for us (we're not "kidding"). A herder brings about 200 goats and they spend roughly a week with us at Google, eating the grass and fertilizing at the same time. The goats are herded with the help of Jen, a border collie. It costs us about the same as mowing, and goats are a lot cuter to watch than lawn mowers.  At our Mountain View headquarters, we have some fields that we need to mow occasionally to clear weeds and brush to reduce fire hazard. This spring we decided to take a low-carbon approach: Instead of using noisy mowers that run on gasoline and pollute the air, we've rented some goats from California Grazing to do the job for us (we're not "kidding"). A herder brings about 200 goats and they spend roughly a week with us at Google, eating the grass and fertilizing at the same time. The goats are herded with the help of Jen, a border collie. It costs us about the same as mowing, and goats are a lot cuter to watch than lawn mowers. 
 http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/mowing-with-goats.html  http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/mowing-with-goats.html 
  
 +----
  
-  +Look beneath the technical sophistication, though, and Cantu's kitchen pyrotechnics are revealed as explorations of possible answers to a very simple question: What is food? And if the cuisine at Motohis "molecular tasting lab," can be described as postmodern, Cantu himself has little time for gastro-academic posing. He's driven by a techno-utopian vision of decentralized food in which the world's ever-growing appetites are met by a radical transformation of agriculture itself - and it all begins in our kitchens. 
-From the Fields is a periodic Wired Science op-ed series presenting leading scientists’ reflections on their worksociety and culture. Erle Ellis has written a response to Wired Science commenters“Save the planet? From who?“ +http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/12/whatisfood.html
  
-Nature is gone. It was gone before you were born, before your parents were born, before the pilgrims arrived, before the pyramids were built. You are living on a used planet.  +----
-If this bothers you, get over it. We now live in the Anthropocene ― a geological epoch in which Earth’s atmosphere, lithosphere and biosphere are shaped primarily by human forces.  +
-http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/05/ftf-ellis-1/#more-3996#ixzz0uDUF41HX +
  
-"The term Anthropocene is used by some scientists to describe the most recent period in the Earth's history. It has no precise start datebut may be considered to start in the late 18th century when the activities of humans first began to have a significant global impact on the Earth's climate and ecosystems. +Organic food metanalysis. (http://www.mosesorganic.org/attachments/research/07orgfeedworld.pdf): Ivette Perfecto of the University of Michigan in the US and her colleagues found that, in developed countries, organic systems on average produce 92% of the yield produced by conventional agriculture. In developing countries, however, organic systems produce 80% more than conventional farms (http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12245-organic-farming-could-feed-the-world.html). Basically, global food yields could go up 80% if we went organic.  
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropocene +http://vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/other/three-reasons-for-hope-energy-fuel-and-food-1797
  
 +----
  
 +Since the Italian Futurist meals and Manifesto of the early 1930’s, food has continued to operate as both a medium and subject of contemporary art. It is unsurprising that, given the current global food crisis, the politics of food have become an important cultural force and that there has once again been a surge of contemporary works dealing with food.
 +http://residualsoup.org
  
-Total Surface Area Required to Fuel the World With Solar +----
  
-According to the US Department of Energy (Energy Information Administration)the world consumption of energy in all of its forms (barrels of petroleumcubic meters of natural gas, watts of hydro power, etc.) is projected to reach 678 quadrillion Btu (or 7.15 exajoules) by 2030 – a 44% increase over 2008 levels (levels for 1980 were 283 quadrillion Btu and we stand at around 500 quadrillion Btu today) +“We’d tried Pepsi and Virgin Cola and various others too,” says Brandon“but they weren’t really a positive alternativeThey were acceptable, but they weren’t CokeAnd people really want Coke.” After conducting various taste tests, they felt the preference had less to do with flavour than the power of the brand(…) “Given that most of the Cube’s customers come because they like the place’s DIY attitude,” Brandon explains“one way of doing that was to make the cola ourselves.” (http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2006/jul/28/foodanddrink.shopping)
-I wonder what surface area would be required and what type of infrastructural investment would be required to supply that amount of power by using only solar panels +
-...  +
-According to the United Nations 170,000 square kilometers of forest is destroyed each year. If we constructed solar farms at the same rate, we would be finished in 3 years +
-There are 1.2 million square kilometers of farmland in China. This is 2 1/2 times the area of solar farm required to power the world in 2030.  +
-The Saharan  Desert is 9,064,958 square kilometers, or 18 times the total required area to fuel the world +
-The typical golf course covers about a square kilometer. We have 40,000 of them around the world being meticulously maintained. If the same could be said for solar farms we would be almost 10% of the way there.  +
-http://www.landartgenerator.org/blagi/archives/127 +
  
 +----
  
 +Greetings from...Your Brightest Possible Future (Vauban District Freiburg) Yes, there is this whole Vauban scene, as if some Teutonic wizard had ransacked the dreams of every idealistic urban planner in the free world and stitched together all the bits and pieces of walkable, mid-rise, mixed-use, transit-friendly, eco-conscious design in the lee of a Black Forest hillside as the setting for a fairy tale called Little Green Riding Hood Rescues Hansel & Gretel and They All Flee the Dark Forest to Live Together in Solar-Powered Social-Democratic Harmony So Luminous It Convinces the Wolf to Self-Domesticate and Form a Limited Partnership with the Witch to Provide Efficiency Retrofits at Reasonable Prices. Yes, yes. All that. Lovely. Wunderbar."
 +http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2010.05-environment-the-new-grand-tour
  
-via: http://www.longnow.org/seminars/02009/oct/09/rethinking-green/  +----
-Globalizing Green  +
-Stewart Brand built his case for rethinking environmental goals and methods on  two major changes going on in the world. The one that most people  still don't take into consideration is that power is shifting to the  developing world, where 5 out of 6 people live, where the bulk of humanity is getting out of poverty by moving to cities and creating  their own jobs and communities (slums, for now). +
  
-He noted that history has always been driven by the world'largest citiesand these years they are places like Mumbai, Lagos, Dhaka, São  Paulo, Karachi, and Mexico City, which are growing 3 times faster and  9 times bigger than cities in the currently developed world ever did. The people in those cities are unstoppably moving up the "energy  ladder" to high quality grid electricity and up the "food ladder"  toward better nutrition, including meat. As soon as they can afford it, everyone in the global South is going to get air conditioning.  +If examine today'cultural trendswe can find sporadic weak signals that suggest that the proliferation of 'green' cultureeconomy and technology will eventually give rise to what Hildegard Von Bingen called 'Viriditas' (Bonnn.d.)or the green side of mind – a deeper environmental consciousnessthat can reconnect our fickle technological (and perhaps technocratic) societies to slowermore persistent geo-ecological scales
-The second dominant global fact is climate change. Brand emphasized  that climate is a severely nonlinear system packed with tipping points  and positive feedbacks such as the unpredicted rapid melting of Arctic  ice. Warming causes droughts, which lowers carrying capacity for  humans, and they fight over the diminishing resourcesas in Darfur It also is melting the glaciers of the Himalayan plateauwhich feed  the rivers on which 40% of humanity depends for water in the dry  season---the IndusGangesBrahmaputra, Mekong, Irrawaddy, Yangtze,  and Yellow.  +http://lib.fo.am/groworld_hpi
-...  +
-Green aversion to technologies such as nuclear and genetic engineering  resulted from a mistaken notion that they are somehow "unnatural."  "What we call natural and what we call human are inseparable," Brand  concluded. "We live one life." +
  
-PS. Long Now likes to include a pointer to related reading. As it   +-----
-happens, the whole "Recommended Reading" section of my book Whole   +
-Earth Discipline is online, with 50 recommendations for books,   +
-magazines, and websites, with live links. It's at: http://www.sbnotes.com +
  
 +“I consider ‘weed’ to be a politically incorrect term. There is no biological definition of the term weed. It’s really a value judgment.
 +If we saw this motley collection of plants differently, we’d realize they’re a kind of marvel: living things in the harsh and stressful urban landscape that don’t just survive there, but thrive. With no effort on our part, they fill the city with greenery, providing cleaner air and water, shade, and food and habitat for wildlife. They do it without expensive fertilizers and irrigation. It’s time, he suggests, that we learned to embrace them — to stop thinking of them only as weeds to uproot, and start considering what they have to offer."
 +...
 +Nothing is native to the city, The modern city is a new kind of habitat — one that provides pockets of livable spaces in surroundings that can be harsh, inhospitable, and polluted. The city habitat is so specialized, our divisions of “native” and “invasive” plants doesn’t really apply here. Instead, the plants that grow and thrive here could be considered the natural denizens of a new kind of habitat — what he calls “cosmopolitan” species. Peter Del Tredici's (a harvard bioloog). http://socialfiction.org/?n=1937
  
 +==== Life ====
  
  
-Three reasons for hope: energy, fuel and food +Life creates the conditions that are conducive to life-Janine Benyus
-I was recently asked if I had hope for the world. I do. There are lots of reasons why, but the three biggest areas are breakthroughs in energy, fuel and food production. These are not all technologies, but they are often technologies. Have a read and see what you think. +
-Energy +
-Nanosolar (http://Nanosolar.com/+
-The pitch: thin film solar panels with a production cost of $0.30 per watt (vs. $2.30 per watt for normal panels). Now here’s the interesting part. Their machinery costs 160 million dollars for a machine which can make a gigawatt of panels per year. Capital cost for a 1 watt of panels printed each year is $0.16 in other words. +
-Sale price for a panel is said to be around $1 for their tech. That leaves an _enormous_ amount of money available to scale with – they’ve got fifty cents on each watt of panels sold to be used for either scaling capacity (tripling it) or as profit. The possibility of very, very fast growth clearly exists here, limited by indium mining capacity probably, but it’s 1/3 as common as silver and has few other industrial uses so it’s likely a soluble problem.+
  
-Fuel +----
-On the transportation fuels front there’s two hot tips. +
-Walter Adey and the Algal Turf Scrubber (http://www.algalturfscrubber.com/+
-Dr. Adey was the coral guy at the Smithsonian. He started growing algae to clean water, so his algae growing technology is always cast as being about clean water, which confuses the picture. Here’s the clear version: he’s fixed biodiesel. How? You know the thick, hairy stuff that grows on stones in rivers? That’s an algal turf. They grow in seawater too. And most of the complexity of harvesting algae is separating single cell critters from the water that surrounds them, where as turfs you harvest with a snowplough type blade. +
-It gets better. Turfs are multi-species, and include multicellular critters – they’re a complete ecosystem. Bonuses are two: firstly, you can grow them open tank and anything that drifts in becomes part of the mix. This means no evil pesticides or “monsanto-style” genetic engineering of algae for pesticide resistance. Second the lipid content of the turfs goes up with time as you get more and more little predators and such like which are just made of lovely, crunchy oils. You just wait until enough oil has buit up for your purposes. +
-Biobutanol (http://www.biobutanol.com/+
-This is a bit more complicated. Nutshell version: ethanol is horrible for engines, pipelines and so on. Butanol is vastly better behaved. +
-Note the possibility of running 100% butanol in an unmodified or slightly tweaked gasoline engine. Now that is still being worked on, but the energy density and lack of corrosion problems seen with ethanol are *very* promising.+
  
-Food +I once read that about 70 per cent of textile designs are floral printsMost certainly, the history of textiles showcases the visual representation of nature as a primary creative inspirationWith recent developments in material science we can now move away from iconic representations of nature and start to designfabricate, and recycle as efficiently as natureThe world of biomimicry has become a key inspiration for the future of design strategies and methodologies… http://lib.fo.am/luminous/what_is_beauty
-Ivette Perfecto (great name) and her big organic food metanalysis(http://www.mosesorganic.org/attachments/research/07orgfeedworld.pdf) +
-Ivette Perfecto of the University of Michigan in the US and her colleagues found that, in developed countries, organic systems on average produce 92% of the yield produced by conventional agricultureIn developing countries, however, organic systems produce 80% more than conventional farms. +
-( http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12245-organic-farming-could-feed-the-world.html) +
-Basically, global food yields could go up 80% if we went organic. Seems moderately solid. +
-One Acre Fund (http://oneacrefund.org/+
-12,000 farms in Africa. One year training program, kind of like health visitors but for farming. For a year they come to your farmvisit, and teach you things. Cost per farm $100 or so, taken as a loan by the farmersAverage results… wait for it… +
-Small Farm Multiplier +
-“In all cases, relatively smaller farm sizes are much more productive per unit area — 200 to 1,000 percent more productive — than are larger ones. In the United States the smallest farms, those of 27 acres or less, have more than ten times greater dollar output per acre than larger farms.” http://www.foodfirst.org/pubs/policybs/pb4.html#productivity +
-Basically big farms are more profitable (lower labor costs) but small farms are more productive, per acre. Food prices rise, small farms become more economic, people produce hell of a lot more food per acre. +
-Excerpts from: http://vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/other/three-reasons-for-hope-energy-fuel-and-food-1797+
  
 +----
  
 +What would the impact be if categories of human explorations were seen not as “economies” – or systems of exchange – but ecologies, in which we played a rightful part? What if, in place of technological categorizations of human activities, we reflected on our lives through a social lens? http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/006498.html
  
-In the Lancet, Dr Terry Hartig, from the Institute for Housing and Urban  
-Research at Uppsala University: 
  
-"This study offers valuable evidence that green space does more than  +----
-'pretty up' the neighbourhood it appears to have real effects on  +
-health inequality, of a kind that politicians and health authorities  +
-should take seriously."+
  
-When the records of more than 366,000 people who died between 2001 and  +A new study by researchers from a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has revealed that people who seed their life with frequent moments of positive emotions increase their resilience against challenges. "This study shows that if happiness is something you want out of life, then focusing daily on the small moments and cultivating positive emotions is the way to go," said Barbara Fredrickson, Ph.D., Kenan Distinguished Professor of Psychology in UNC's College of Arts and Sciences and the principal investigator of the Positive Emotions and Psychophysiology Laboratory. 
-2005 were analysedit revealed that even tiny green spaces in the areas  +http://news.oneindia.in/2009/07/09/positiveemotions-increase-resilience-againstchallenges.html
-in which they lived made a big difference to their risk of fatal diseases.+
  
-Even small parks in the heart of our cities can protect us from strokes  +---- 
-and heart disease, perhaps by cutting stress or boosting exercise.+ 
 +So I have two questions for you all: First, can you feel your body? Stop for a moment. Feel your body. One septillion activities going on simultaneously, and your body does this so well you are free to ignore it, and wonder instead when this speech will end. You can feel it. It is called life. This is who you are. Second question: who is in charge of your body? Who is managing those molecules? Hopefully not a political party. Life is creating the conditions that are conducive to life inside you, just as in all of nature. Our innate nature is to create the conditions that are conducive to life. What I want you to imagine is that collectively humanity is evincing a deep innate wisdom in coming together to heal the wounds and insults of the past. Ralph Waldo Emerson once asked what we would do if the stars only came out once every thousand years. No one would sleep that night, of course. The world would create new religions overnight. We would be ecstatic, delirious, made rapturous by the glory of God. Instead, the stars come out every night and we watch television. 
 +http://globalmindshift.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/the-unforgettable-commencement-address-by-paul-hawken-to-the-class-of-2009-university-of-portland-may-3-2009/ 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +We have come to the point at which there is no other way than to bring about a movement to bring nothing about” - Masanobu Fukuoka 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +How resilient are you? – a quiz. 
 +http://psychology.about.com/library/quiz/bl-resilience-quiz.htm 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +For most of the 20th century, nutritional science aimed to define an adequate diet. (…) Toward the end of the century, it became clear from laboratory studies and comparisons in health statistics in different countries that the major diseases of the adequately nourished developed world – cancer and heart disease – are influenced by what we eat. Nutritional science then began to focus on defining the elements of an optimal diet. So we discovered that minor, nonessential food components have a cumulative effects on our long-term health. And plants, the planet's biochemical virtuosos, turn out to be teeming with trace phytochemicals (…) that modulate our metabolism. - Harold McGee 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +Successfully coping with a stressful situation can prime one for dealing with subsequent stressful situations that are not controllable. The brain circuitry that underlies this transfer of resiliency includes the prefrontal cortex and brainstem.  
 +http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/content/42/3/28.2.full 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +"This study offers valuable evidence that green space does more than 'pretty up' the neighbourhood - it appears to have real effects on health inequality, of a kind that politicians and health authorities should take seriously." When the records of more than 366,000 people who died between 2001 and 2005 were analysed, it revealed that even tiny green spaces in the areas in which they lived made a big difference to their risk of fatal diseases. Even small parks in the heart of our cities can protect us from strokes and heart disease, perhaps by cutting stress or boosting exercise.
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7714950.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7714950.stm
  
 +----
  
 +It seems as if writing with moss, represents an unusual synthesis between advanced civilisation and nature. It is a chance for us to speak as individuals and artists, but also to be the spokesperson of organisms which have no voice in our world.
 +http://www.crosshatchling.co.uk/Mossgrafitti.html
 +
 +----
 +
 +A working eco-travel monitoring system will resemble a sort of stock market. It can be a way of increasing the perceived value of pristine nature, whose only value at present appears to be seen just in terms of its natural resources. Realising the enjoyable assets of nature can drive conservation forward. http://lib.fo.am/luminous/kaario_jouka_responsible_tourist_communities
 +
 +----
 +
 +The first and probably most precious resource that people can share is time. A quite successful effort in the exchange of “free time” has emerged in Italy, mediated by public institutions, called La Banca del Tempo (The Bank of Time). You donate one hour of your time doing something useful for somebody else (such as teaching a foreign language, painting a wall, etc.) and in return you receive a reciprocal service from someone who’ll spend one hour doing something for you. It’s an invisible network that makes time free from a quantified economic value, testing a different type of economics. http://lib.fo.am/luminous/ludovico_free_online_exchange
 +
 +----
 +
 +“Pleasure is what makes life valuable. It is what provides the motive among sentient creatures to engage in life-sustaining activities” – Herbert Spencer
 +
 +----
 +
 +Suddenly I realize
 +That if I stepped out of my body I would break
 +Into blossom. -James Wright
 +
 +====Viridian Principles 2.0 (abridged)====
 +
 +===Futurist Principles===
 +
 +  * **Embrace Decay** - Entropic processes should be closely studied, harnessed for industrial use, and even aestheticized.
 +  * **Planned Evanescence** - the product and all its physical traces should gracefully disintegrate and vanish entirely.
 +  * **Eat what you Kill** - take pains to fully comprehend the thing you have rendered obsolete.
 +  * **The Future is History** - Be when you are.
 +  * **History Accumulates** - invent better ways to manage our increasing wealth of history
 +
 +===Moral Principles===
 +
 +  * **Look at the Underside First** - point out malfunctions, bugs, screw-ups, design failures, side effects, and the whole sad galaxy of trade-offs and failings inherent in any technological artefact.
 +  * **Design for Evil** - Every design process is incomplete unless it takes into careful consideration what could be done with the product by a dictatorial megalomaniac in command of a national economy, secret police and large army.
 +  * **Design for Old** - The 21st century will have a historically unprecedented demographic structure.
 +  * **Superstition isn’t Inspiration** - There’s no effective substitute for experimental verification and verifiable results.
 +
 +===Political Principles===
 +
 +  * **Viridian Inactivism** - Activism is an attention hog. Find the things you are doing that intensify problems, and cease doing them. Seek command of your own life.
 +  * **Do Less with Less** - We should struggle valiantly to find alternative sources of energy, but it’s just as gratifying to simply become less frenetic. What exactly are we doing at the moment that is worth ruining the climate for? Relax.
 +  * **There’s No One so Green as the Dead** - If you feel helpless with guilt because of your bad environmental habits, pause and think of the very brief time in which you employ the Earth’s resources, and the long, long eons in which you’ll just be raw material again.
 +  * **The Viridian Grandfather Principle** - Viridians prefer to carry out green activities than living people can do well
 +
 +===Principles of the Avant-technogarde===
 +
 +  * **The Biological isn’t Logical** - The living world was not designed by a teleological, rationalist, reductionist process. The living world grew irrationally through nonsystematic, genetic exploration of niche possibilities, pruned back by natural selection and occasional massive disasters. 
 +  * **Augment Reality: Aestheticize all Sensors** - Sensors, instrumentation, and mediated monitoring systems of all kinds are the next aesthetic frontier. Sensors must interact with the human sensorium, and are properly seen as not primarily technical, but aesthetic.
 +  * **Make the Invisible Visible** - Advances in instrumentation can be used to change the zeitgeist
 +  * **Less Mass, More Data** - If you always know where something is, you don’t have to chain it up. Physical resources should be replaced with information where possible.
 +  * **Tangible Cyberspace** - introduce computer generated artefacts and processes into the deepest and most intimate textures of the physical world. Make the screen permeable, and turn ‘computers’ into worldly, sensual entities. 
 +  * **Seek the Biomorphic and the Transgenic** - “Nature” is over. What does it mean when you look into the garden and the garden looks back?
 +  * **Datamine Nature** - There is a wealth of aesthetic novelty to be found in previously invisible aspects of nature, such as cellular metabolism, noninvasive medical imaging, hybridomas and chimeras, artificial life entities and chemosynthetic life forms.
 +  * **Grow Complexity** - look for patterns that are both tasteful and previously impossible. With computers it is absurdly simple to create any level of busyness and complexity. Without human aesthetic intervention, this art is puerile and ugly.
 +
 +===Research Principles===
 +
 +  * **Walk Through the Walls of Knowledge Guilds** - The boundaries that separate art, science, medicine, literature, computation, engineering, and design and craft generally are not divine. These boundaries are socially generated. Research techniques are not identical, nor are results all equally valid under all circumstances; quantum physics isn’t opera.. There exists a sensibility that can transcend intellectual turf war with no loss of rigor. If you choose to do it, you can step outside the boundaries history makes for you. You can walk through walls.
 +
 +----
 +
 +=== Related reading suggestions from workshops in 2007, 2008 and 2009: ===
 + 
 +  * http://lib.fo.am/luminous/recommended_reading
 +  * http://lib.fo.am/luminous/sampler
 +  * http://lib.fo.am/luminous/
  
  
-http://www.nature.com/nature/podcast/index-2009-09-24.html 
-Podcast on planetary boundaries  
  
  
  
  • luminous/reader_2010.1279717026.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2010-07-21 12:57
  • by 83.101.5.51