'Valuing What Matters' Experiment
Hypothesis / Challenge
Experiment design
Experiment 3 to change perceptions of marine conservation (NGOs)
See also: charm offensive experiment and gone fishing in the Thames experiment
Experiment description: Create a scenario and trade-off analysis related to health costs. Finding a way to speak the language of policy makers by focusing on costs that are important to them, such as health costs. A cost/benefit analysis is needed.
16624611407
full size image
Implementation:
explore ways of presenting a counter-factual case study in terms of decreased health costs
collaboration between economics and marine conservation
research what could be [sourced?] up in a credible way
Needs
Offers
Nic: FF’s experience at engaging communities/fishers; inputs to workshop; connections and networks of others working on the issue; possibility of peer exchange
Giles: Facilitation
MVL: Access to scientific experts if useful; case study feeding [xxxx] (Bloomberg)
Sue: developing, monitoring and evaluation tools to measure impact; time and research
Aniol: paella, economics [xxxx] connector [person?]
Andrew F: health benefits of Natura 2000
Andrew B.: Party, Valuing nature/health
Louisa: venue, info blue week, with [xxx], share experiences of [xxx]
Amy: taking the lead on 'gone fishing’; time, ideas, contacts for day out; time or sounding board for cultural
Progress
Results