Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-11-27 09:53] – [Next Steps] nik | marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2016-01-20 13:24] – maja | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ==== Workshop | + | ==== Marine CoLABoration |
- | At the London Zoo | + | The last [[start|Marine CoLAB]] workshop in 2015, held at the London Zoo on the 25th of November. Louisa Hooper compared it to standing at the seashore at low tide, with rocks and mud emerging from under water, when we can begin to see the peaks, as well as what lies beneath. One of the biggest challenges for this workshop and the year ahead is how to work more effectively with the resources available. The importance of keeping the big picture visible was emphasised, alongside the practicalities of projects, activities and campaigns. |
+ | |||
+ | In the morning the participants focused om **Marine CoLAB as a whole**. Beginning with a reflection on //Marine CoLAB so far//, looking at what has worked and what needs more work. Grounded in this experience they moved into a visioning process lead by Giles to clarify the Marine CoLAB //vision and mission//. At the end of the morning Sue took the group through a beautiful presentation and discussion of a //values based approach//, as a lens that can be used to shape and evaluate projects, experiments and the initiative itself. In the afternoon, the focus shifted to the **Marine CoLAB project incubator**, | ||
==== Participants ===== | ==== Participants ===== | ||
+ | |||
Louisa Hooper, Heather Koldewey, Sandy Luk, Nicola Frost, Amy Pryor, Aniol Esteban, Giles Bristow, Sue Ranger, Mirella von Lindenfels, Sarah Ridley. | Louisa Hooper, Heather Koldewey, Sandy Luk, Nicola Frost, Amy Pryor, Aniol Esteban, Giles Bristow, Sue Ranger, Mirella von Lindenfels, Sarah Ridley. | ||
Facilitators: | Facilitators: | ||
- | ==== Framing ==== | + | {{> |
+ | ====Marine CoLAB so far==== | ||
- | This is the last workshop of the first year of Marine CoLAB. Louisa Hooper compared it to standing at the seashore at low tide, with rocks and mud emerging under water, so we can begin to see the peaks, as well as what underlies them. One of the biggest challenges for this workshop and the coming year is how to do less with game-changing effectiveness. It is important to look at the big picture as well well as the practicalities of the months and year(s) to come. | + | The morning began by distilling |
- | + | ||
- | Maja Kuzmanovic looked back over the notes of the past year and distilled | + | |
- | At the very first workshop the participants designed a range of possible future scenarios for Marine CoLAB and the worlds in which it would exist. The different futures had two things in common: Marine CoLAB would be integrating values and innovation, as well as establishing and strengthening connections (between the ocean and society, between business and governments, | + | At the very first workshop the participants designed a range of possible future scenarios for Marine CoLAB and the worlds in which it could exist. The different futures had two things in common: Marine CoLAB would be integrating values and innovation, as well as establishing and strengthening connections (between the ocean and society, between business and governments, |
Over the course of several workshops, a range of challenges for Marine CoLAB were identified, including systemic change, public engagement, valuing (cultural dimensions) of oceans, perception of marine conservation, | Over the course of several workshops, a range of challenges for Marine CoLAB were identified, including systemic change, public engagement, valuing (cultural dimensions) of oceans, perception of marine conservation, | ||
- | Finally, before delving into the futures, mission, values and a range of experiments, | + | Finally, before delving into the futures, mission, values and a range of experiments, |
+ | {{> | ||
- | ====Marine CoLAB so far==== | + | === What worked? |
+ | |||
+ | == People == | ||
+ | * Supportive and energising group of people; Imaginative, | ||
+ | * Open - want to be doing this; Openness of everyone in embracing something new | ||
+ | * Enthusiasm, engagement and energy of members during LAB meetings | ||
+ | * Broad range of skills, expertise and organisation; | ||
+ | * Good balance of personalities | ||
+ | * Willingness to communicate | ||
+ | * Good size of group | ||
+ | * Good vibes! | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Time & space to explore === | ||
+ | * Flexibility, | ||
+ | * Time spent together without explicit agendas/ | ||
+ | * Thinking about issues from different perspectives | ||
+ | * Lack of territoriality and competition | ||
+ | * Building connections within the group | ||
+ | * Time, workshops to explore - facilitation has helped | ||
+ | * New dimensions brought in from CGF (e.g. other labs and communities) | ||
+ | * Workshops in stimulating environments - allowing us to think outside our daily / OP’s (?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Community building == | ||
+ | * Listening and finding out about different ways we create change | ||
+ | * A clearer sense of each other and the interests from our organisations | ||
+ | * We are trying to understand each others’ strengths and see how working together could add value | ||
+ | * Building a sense of vision and ambition | ||
+ | * The team is becoming more confidently creative and innovative - sharing and talking more - developing a TRUSTED network; Trust each other to share ideas, thoughts strengths and weaknesses - no territoriality | ||
+ | * Self-organising - members of the team are taking the lead on aspects of work - shared leadership | ||
+ | * Individual initiative starts the ball rolling (e.g. Heather - Plastics, Giles - Vision/ | ||
+ | * Finding a common project (e.g. Plastic pollution) to get our teeth into a specific challenge, that uses existing skills and interests - sum bigger than parts. | ||
+ | * Mix of work and social | ||
+ | * Developing new networks and relationships; | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Support == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * CGF: Hands-on engagement, support and guidance of Louisa and CGF, their agility and responsiveness (e.g. supporting conference attendance, networking) | ||
+ | * Facilitators: | ||
+ | * Connections of the group to ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | === What needs more work? === | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Time! == | ||
+ | * Time to deliver our potential of all ideas and projects | ||
+ | * Finding enough time to engage outside of project ideas that are not core business | ||
+ | * More time thinking and developing a framework for evaluation | ||
+ | * Retain energy over longer term; retain energy once in project delivery mode | ||
+ | * Communication between meetings; time to do things and connect between meetings (though it is happening); Embedding CoLAB work between workshops - often a last minute flurry of preparation for each one. | ||
+ | * Information overload - not always possible to digest what is shared | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == CoLAB == | ||
+ | * Define a sense of direction | ||
+ | * Clarity of vision and objectives | ||
+ | * Application of value frame to other work | ||
+ | * Come back to CGF’s aim valuing the oceans and thinking about strategies to tackle this directly - not getting caught in the " | ||
+ | * Developing ideas/ | ||
+ | * Identify the best skills and input a Marcolab project can give to specific needs | ||
+ | * Bringing in more of an "arts + culture" | ||
+ | * Articulation of where Marine CoLAB fits with other initiatives | ||
+ | * Structure to support without becoming burdensome machine | ||
+ | * Need to figure out how to enable effective communication (between individuals, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Communication and stakeholder engagement == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Clearly communicating what the Marine CoLAB is and does | ||
+ | * Connecting beyond the LAB, both with LAB organisations and other orgs. | ||
+ | * Promotion of ideas and approaches to wider community | ||
+ | * Connecting to other things happening at CGF: other projects and areas of work CGF supports + learning from other work CGF supported | ||
+ | * System to enable dissemination of thoughts and approaches and coalesce (?) | ||
+ | * (fishermen, mpa’s, pollution) | ||
+ | * Ability to integrate others in some aspects, without losing cohesion of the group | ||
+ | * Creative communications - communicating complex concepts, training… | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Connect to organisations == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Dedicated staff | ||
+ | * In-house skills and capacity for four group projects | ||
+ | * Us as individuals in CoLAB vs us as organisation; | ||
+ | * Understanding how to manage and maximise positive feedback into participating organisations | ||
+ | |||
+ | === What can we improve? === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Get better at knowing "who we are, where we go and how we do it". | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Organisational buy-in == | ||
+ | * Engage not just individuals, | ||
+ | * Clarifying the strategic lines of work of Marine CoLAB (3 lines?) | ||
+ | * Offering value add (e.g. building effective collaborations) | ||
+ | * Try to find a common agenda that all organisations would be interested in | ||
+ | * If Marine CoLAB activities can fit into day-to-day agendas of existing work in the participating organisations, | ||
+ | * Think about the structure of the collaboration and how it could overlap with organisational missions, activities and strategies. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Sustainability == | ||
+ | * innovation | ||
+ | * collaboration | ||
+ | * projects | ||
+ | * Core funding is likely to be needed for Marine CoLAB as a whole, as some of the organisations are only funded on a project basis, | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Communication | ||
+ | |||
+ | (within organisations, | ||
+ | * Focus outwards | ||
+ | * Create a thought piece explaining something like "this is the benefit of 12 months of Marine CoLAB", | ||
====Future of Marine CoLAB==== | ====Future of Marine CoLAB==== | ||
+ | {{> | ||
+ | The visions of Marine CoLAB in 2021 | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Value is at heart of Marine CoLAB, connecting the public with oceans and increasing the environmental benefit. Value is also a challenge for Marine CoLAB, defining the rules of the game. The CoLAB is a framework that feeds the organisations involved with game-changing ideas and projects. It isn’t quite clear what the size of its pond is, but it is likely that its purpose is to think, or perhaps think and implement, more likely to connect and spawn initiatives rather than do everything itself. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Marine CoLAB perpetuates change in three areas: governmental/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Clarity about the added value of Marine CoLAB, for the organisations and the world. There is a clear articulation of strategy in three strands: | ||
+ | * Actual experiments that show change; including learning from the process, replicating and adapting experiments to other areas, developing metrics, etc. | ||
+ | * Good internal and external communication reaching broad audiences | ||
+ | * Values shift | ||
====Mission / MIX==== | ====Mission / MIX==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Value shift: what is Marine CoLAB’s theory of change? All participating organisations have one, but the glue could be the ' | ||
+ | * Recognising existing values, rather than changing or creating ' | ||
+ | * What is the timeframe? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Glue: values based → USP → what is the BIGGER SHIFT the lab wants to focus on (e.g. climate change, fossil fuels and oceans - a big goal to strive towards)? What are the relevant values for this goal? As a lab, how do we experiment with strategies? | ||
+ | |||
+ | When talking about a values based approach, there could be two possibilities: | ||
+ | * Recognising and amplifying values: the CoLAB needs clearer ideas for methods to ' | ||
+ | * Changing values: a more pro-active process, although perhaps an impossibility - possibly better to focus on changing behaviours instead. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | To do in 2016 → look at values based campaigning [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Next steps== | ||
+ | * Giles to compile a proposal for a mission statement based on these reflections and the materials from Lisbon. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ( cross reference w. Giles' notes ) | ||
+ | |||
====Values based approach==== | ====Values based approach==== | ||
+ | {{> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Presentation by Sue Ranger == | ||
+ | |||
+ | There is a need to find a language all Marine CoLAB participants understand, paying attention to jargon. There is a difference between the term " | ||
+ | |||
+ | In order to uncover deeper values, we need to start with basic connectedness (of people and places, different disciplines...). This can form a glue, a common basis and shared understanding. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * developing a shared language based around values we can use to communicate within the group | ||
+ | * ' | ||
+ | * uncovering existing values, aligning values | ||
+ | * issue based theory of change -> value based | ||
+ | * bringing various voices, with various values into discussion | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Discussion == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The values based approach is the hallmark of Marine CoLAB, a prism or lens through which the LAB and its activities are designed and assessed. Filling the gap between the values of humans and the value of oceans. The value of oceans tends to be misunderstood and needs to be communicated differently. An **iconic campaign** might help, as well as focusing on issues by describing the value of oceans, such as the plastics project and other **values based experiments**, | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are different methods to approach values, depending on the theory of change applied. Should Marine CoLAB have one or more theory of change? Is there a generic TOC or a range of context specific theories that can mobilise new voices and gather evidence? Is the uniqueness of Marine CoLAB’s TOC important? Would it not be more relevant to focus on adding value? | ||
+ | |||
+ | What are the values of Marine CoLAB? Could **shared values** be Marine CoLAB’s focus at all times and across all projects? | ||
+ | |||
+ | How to begin using a values based approach in Marine CoLAB: **learn by doing**! | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Next steps == | ||
+ | * invite speakers | ||
+ | * share readings | ||
+ | * personal exercises (akin to Sue’s values presentation) | ||
+ | * incorporating it in projects | ||
+ | * values a part of all Marine CoLAB communication | ||
====Project Incubator==== | ====Project Incubator==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mapping existing and emerging projects by organisations as a way to identify strategic lines of work for Marine CoLAB | ||
+ | |||
+ | The participants identified three main groupings for projects | ||
+ | * opportunities around MPA & spatial planning, policy related | ||
+ | * schools, training & educational projects | ||
+ | * exporting knowledge & support / capacity building | ||
+ | |||
+ | List of relevant projects | ||
+ | |||
+ | == MPAs and marine planning == | ||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | * Common ground: [[http:// | ||
+ | * MPA campaign/ | ||
+ | * Sustainable seafood in Portugal, Spain and EU (NEF, MCS & Client Earth - reducing unlawful fishing; scoping, looking at minimal standards for the seafood industry; including different stakeholders (policy, communities, | ||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Education and communication== | ||
+ | * Thames river academy (educational projects) across different sectors, using rivers and seas as the bedrock of the curriculum and active environmental projects as the basis for transferable skills training. | ||
+ | * Ocean schools: ocean awareness as part of general knowledge, general education | ||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Capacity building== | ||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | * Capacity building at FFI: new educational programmes, scholarships, | ||
+ | * (FFI co-management approach) | ||
+ | * Related: strengthening NGO capacity in Portugal (Aniol) | ||
+ | * Diverting EU marine funding to 'good things' | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Next steps == | ||
+ | * Aniol to compile & reformat existing info by end of the week, make a [[Project Incubator Form]] | ||
+ | * Edits, additions and value prompt to be submitted by Dec. 4th | ||
+ | * (cross reference these notes with Aniol' | ||
+ | * Next workshop: | ||
+ | * Find specific ways for Marine CoLAB to inform or engage with existing and new projects (e.g. advisers) | ||
+ | * Write up value space for each project -> further mapping | ||
+ | * Rethink projects in terms of value lens, changes of impact with contributions from other partners, possibly create a time-line and potential interactions between projects (dependencies....) | ||
====Game On!==== | ====Game On!==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{> | ||
+ | Ocean Engagement: gaming approaches | ||
+ | |||
+ | " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Challenge: "how can we change perception of the value of oceans through digital media?" | ||
+ | GameOn is an experiment to test the hypothesis that it is possible to do this by developing games or influencing game developers. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Several ides have surfaced, all with challenges and opportunities. The common challenge for all is deciding how and when to engage the pubic in the process, and who the target audience is (children, gamers, game developers…). It remains interesting to look at ways to make conservation games more mainstream, while at the same time focusing on awareness and education. There are many possible partners, but the CoLAB needs specific contacts and entry points to the games industry. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first [[game on experiment]] focused on public engagement with rules related to oceans, which might be less game focused, perhaps more suitable as a training tool. Instead, it might be better to focus on more general 'ocean awareness' | ||
+ | * __Develop a game__ (see below) | ||
+ | * __Influence game developers__: | ||
+ | |||
+ | If Marine CoLAB would develop a game, different approaches are possible: | ||
+ | * **Coached lab session** or " | ||
+ | * Develop **add-ons to existing games** | ||
+ | * Develop games as **tie-ins** to other games/ | ||
+ | * Develop a full-blown mainstream **marine conservation game**, e.g. a ’simcity-like’ versions of initial scenarios (from [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Out of these directions, the group distilled three most promising options for progress and looked at their advantages and disadvantages: | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Small Lab Games== | ||
+ | * Advantages: existing format, easier to test assumptions with small games, practice-based learning of values; connecting environmental and technological challenges | ||
+ | * Disadvantages: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Marine Conservation Game== | ||
+ | * Advantages: Making such a game would connect digital and conservation worlds; There is possibly large impact and educational opportunities, | ||
+ | * Disadvantages high expectations, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Influencing Game Developers== | ||
+ | * Advantages might be scope for a 'think tank' with more general (less issue/ | ||
+ | * Disadvantages: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Next steps== | ||
+ | * more preliminary research to see which option is most promising | ||
+ | * Sandy, Sue & Heather: Potential research questions, masters topics for students of Exeter University: "next week" to draft a few paragraphs re. research scope etc. Envisaged results: a " | ||
+ | * Heather: connect this experiment to the ZSL project on virtual Chagos (British, controversial, | ||
+ | * Sue/MCS, probe existing contacts (Octonauts) as potential test audience. | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | (cross reference with Sandy' | ||
+ | |||
====Plastics project==== | ====Plastics project==== | ||
+ | {{> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Working session of the now fully funded (CGF & OAK Foundation) Marine CoLAB project: campaign to make London free of Single Use Plastic Bottles. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Three topics to touch on: | ||
+ | * Values | ||
+ | * Reality check (commitments, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Values== | ||
+ | |||
+ | What will make individuals change behaviour (intrinsic, economic…)? | ||
+ | * Look at Frameworks research and qualitative research | ||
+ | * How to avoid industry backlash? | ||
+ | * How to make it sustainable? | ||
+ | * Focus as a marine project rather than just about ' | ||
+ | * Have to have a closer look at what has failed in other projects to inform strategy | ||
+ | * how to ensure 'best advice' | ||
+ | * start compling hideous facts about single use bottles | ||
+ | * Design campaign to include values as an essential part of it: continue discussion at the brainstorming meeting in December. | ||
+ | * How to explicitly test values based research? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Reality Check == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The funding proposal was successful: now a few urgent things to do: | ||
+ | * By 11 December 2015, All: Re:read the proposal, agree on commitments and/or adapt if needed. | ||
+ | * ASAP: Heather, Steve, Louisa: paperwork | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Collaborative structure | ||
+ | * Project management at ZSL (via Project Oceans), narrative & communication TEP | ||
+ | * Governance: overview committee, advisory group - needs to be finalised | ||
+ | * Recruiting: By 16 December: Heather & Amy: draft job descriptions for 2 FTEs (and form an interview panel), advertise in December | ||
+ | * January: interview applicants | ||
+ | * Compile a project team ASAP | ||
+ | * Giles/FF: has staff for research & background, active mapping process. Connect FF’s interns to work on researching case studies (Bristol (tap friendly, public fountains…) Selfridges, ZSL, etc), C40, cities as chanpions, COP, tourism, Blue Bell… | ||
+ | * (Longer term): Form advisory group with different stakeholders (Sue has ideas) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Implementation plan | ||
+ | * 16 December: Initial startup meeting: Heather, Mirella, Amy, Giles, Louisa | ||
+ | * 12 January (from 2pm) Full planning meeting with other experts from organisations | ||
+ | * After January plan at least one meeting per month | ||
+ | * Short term focus: Mayoral election in May 2016: need strategy for mayoral candidates - Campaigns are written NOW (Louisa has a few people who should be engaged in this): | ||
+ | * How to get a meeting? Exploratory conversations to identify what is the opportunity for the candidates. | ||
+ | * Offer solutions/ | ||
+ | * Longer term: Systems Mapping exercise and stakeholder conversations (linked to advisory group) | ||
+ | * Identify target groups (from systems mapping) | ||
+ | * Outsource research: to e.g. frameworks research - additional funding will be available for this research from CGF. Which questions need asking? | ||
+ | | ||
+ | * Link to related initiatives, | ||
+ | * Research any upcoming 'big things' | ||
+ | | ||
====Planning 2016==== | ====Planning 2016==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10 days of time per organisation is covered by CGF core funding for Marine CoLAB. How best to structure the time? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Marine CoLAB as a collaborative network== | ||
+ | * What does a lab community look like? | ||
+ | * Collaboration as an improvement over competition for limited resources | ||
+ | * Added value of open thinking space, facilitated structure | ||
+ | * Further work required on values, strategy, project updates, planning, evaluation. | ||
+ | * 4~6 days of meetings of entire group | ||
+ | * some time for thinking about wider issues, larger context, incubation of vague ideas (cf. global strategy for sharks) | ||
+ | * What can we teach each other? Discuss learning which emerges from projects | ||
+ | * More focus on strategy, strategy work team, external communication | ||
+ | * To do: circulate set of objectives, further ideas towards a governance structure, business and operational models (next workshop early 2016) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Marine CoLAB Activities / Projects == | ||
+ | * Smaller, structured meetings around particular topics/ | ||
+ | * Aggregating projects (from existing/ | ||
+ | * Clarify criteria for 'a lab project' | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Communication and stakeholder engagement == | ||
+ | * Time to proactively communicate! | ||
+ | * Clarify evidence base for the lab, both process and projects | ||
+ | * How can new/other partners get involved in the future? Strategy for engagement? | ||
+ | * Better integration of partners into project proposals -> more explicit collaborations | ||
+ | |||
====Next Steps==== | ====Next Steps==== | ||
- | * project mapping | + | |
- | * write up value space for each project -> further mapping | + | |
- | * Aniol to compile & reformat existing info by end of the week | + | 07/12 Fill in the Project Incubator Form. |
- | * edits, additions | + | * The form and questions can be found here: http://lib.fo.am/ |
- | * game on | + | * -> Send to Aniol |
- | * potential research questions, masters topics. | + | |
- | * sandy, sue & heather draft a few paragraphs | + | 11/12 Re-read the proposal, agree on commitments. |
- | * plastics | + | * -> Send to Heather |
- | * schedule next meetings, brainstorming, etc | + | |
- | * project | + | 16/12 Plastics project working meeting (Marine CoLAB only). |
- | * establish | + | * -> Let Heather know if you’re coming. |
- | * 2016 and further | + | |
- | * write a few paragraphs about how Marine colab has changed/improved current work | + | 24/12 Write a few paragraphs |
- | * circulate set of objectives, further ideas | + | * e.g. How did it affect ways of working, key outcomes for you, effects it had on specific projects, long term value etc. |
- | * year in review 1 pager from each participant by xmas -> send to louisa | + | * -> Send to Louisa. |
+ | |||
+ | Dec. GameOn: Potential research questions and masters topics | ||
+ | | ||
+ | * -> Heather: connect GameOn to ' | ||
+ | * -> Sue: probe contacts (Octonauts) as potential test audience | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dec. Plastics: | ||
+ | * Project | ||
+ | * Establish | ||
+ | |||
+ | 12/01 | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Before the next workshop == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Circulate set of objectives for Marine CoLAB in 2016 and beyond | ||
+ | * Collect ideas towards | ||
+ | * Mission: Giles to send the mission statement for review to all | ||
+ | * Values: | ||
+ | * Share reading on this topic online: http:// | ||
+ | * Invite speakers (e.g. Chris Rose, Frameworks...) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == During the next workshop == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Values based approach | ||
+ | * All: present your approach to values connecting humans and oceans | ||
+ | * Values based approach as the hallmark of the Marine CoLAB Strategy | ||
+ | * Values a part of all Marine CoLAB communication | ||
+ | * Rethink projects | ||
+ | |||
+ | Vision, Mission, Strategy for Marine CoLAB network | ||
+ | * Finalise work from previous workshops | ||
+ | * Discuss business, governance and operational models (incl. best practices from CGF) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Project Incubator | ||
+ | * Discuss how to inform or engage with existing and new projects | ||
+ | * Further mapping; Contributions from other partners, possibly a time-line and potential interactions between projects (dependencies…) | ||