Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-11-27 10:17] – [Next Steps] nik | marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-11-27 10:33] – [Plastics project] nik | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| {{> | {{> | ||
| + | * successful funding proposal | ||
| + | * mayoral election in may 2016 | ||
| + | * focus as a marine project rather than just about ' | ||
| + | * " | ||
| + | * closer look at what has failed, expected backlash, sustainability, | ||
| + | * required; project implementation plan, timeline, external deadlines. kickoff meeting (before xmas) | ||
| + | * collaborative structure; | ||
| + | * 2 ppl full time - project mgmt at ZSL (via Project Oceans), narrative & communication TEP | ||
| + | * FF interns & some staff for research & background, active mapping process | ||
| + | * governance? overview committee, advisory group | ||
| + | * connections with existing NGOs working in ' | ||
| + | * Emma Cunningham re. stakeholder interviews, industry, NGOs, etc | ||
| + | * how to ensure 'best advice' | ||
| + | * strategy for mayoral candidates | ||
| + | * establish list of allies, existing contacts and relevant conversations, | ||
| + | * any upcoming 'big things' | ||
| + | * start compling hideous facts about single use bottles | ||
| + | * potential case studies (selfridges, | ||
| + | * how do we explicitly test values based research? | ||
| ====Planning 2016==== | ====Planning 2016==== | ||
| + | * 10 days of time is covered per organisation | ||
| + | * how best to structure the time? | ||
| + | * smaller, structured meetings around particular topics/ | ||
| + | * aggregating projects (mapping), specific project (plastics) | ||
| + | * discuss learning which emerges from projects | ||
| + | * what can we teach each other | ||
| + | * sometime for thinking about wider issues, larger context, incubation of vague ideas. | ||
| + | * time to proactively communicate, | ||
| + | * better integration of partners into project proposals -> more explicit collaborations | ||
| + | * clarify evidence base for the lab, both process and projects | ||
| + | * collaboration as an improvement over competition for limited resources | ||
| + | * how can new/other partners get involved in the future? | ||
| + | * more focus on strategy, strategy work team, external communication | ||
| + | * 4~6 days of meetings of entire group | ||
| + | * (cf. global strategy for sharks) | ||
| + | * added value of open thinking space, facilitated structure | ||
| + | * further work required on values, strategy, project updates, planning, evaluation. | ||
| + | * circulate set of objectives, further ideas | ||
| + | * what does a lab community look like? | ||
| + | * strategy for engagement? | ||
| + | * clear criteria for 'a lab project'? | ||
| ====Next Steps==== | ====Next Steps==== | ||
nik