Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-11-27 10:33] – [Planning 2016] nik | marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-11-27 10:59] – [Project Incubator] nik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
{{> | {{> | ||
+ | (cross reference with Aniol' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * ways to identify strategic lines of work | ||
+ | * list of relevant projects | ||
+ | * marine safe | ||
+ | * coastal partnership network | ||
+ | * Thames river academy (educational projects) | ||
+ | * beach watch | ||
+ | * capturing the value of our coast (citizen science, data collection) | ||
+ | * capacity building at FFI (new educational programmes, masters, adult ed. etc) | ||
+ | * strengthening NGO capacity in Portugal (aniol) | ||
+ | * common ground (community voice project followup, biz case for marine resource mgmt) | ||
+ | * MPA programme (increase in capacity for creating marine protected areas) | ||
+ | * (FFI co-management approach) | ||
+ | * sustainable seafood in Portugal (MCS & Client Earth - reducing unlawful fishing) | ||
+ | * ocean schools (ocean awareness as part of general knowledge, general education) | ||
+ | * # | ||
+ | * Blue New Deal | ||
+ | * diverting EU marine funding to 'good things' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * three main groupings | ||
+ | * opportunities around MPA & spatial planning, policy related | ||
+ | * schools, training & educational projects | ||
+ | * exporting knowledge & support / capacity building | ||
+ | * (global wave conference) | ||
+ | * capturing the value of our coast -> possible focus for various experiments, | ||
+ | * rethinking projects in terms of value lens, changes of impact with contributions from other partners | ||
+ | * time-line and potential interactions between projects (dependencies....) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * next steps | ||
+ | * find specific ways for marine colab to inform existing and new projects, either as advisers, | ||
+ | * write up value space for each project -> further mapping | ||
+ | * Aniol to compile & reformat existing info by end of the week | ||
+ | * edits, additions and value prompt to be submitted by Dec. 4th | ||
====Game On!==== | ====Game On!==== | ||
{{> | {{> | ||
+ | |||
+ | * (cross reference with Sandy' | ||
+ | * ideas that have surfaced / developed | ||
+ | * challenge; how/when to engage the pubic to change rules / process | ||
+ | * concluded that the first experiment was not so game focused, perhaps more suitable as a training tool | ||
+ | * perhaps better to focus on more general 'ocean awareness' | ||
+ | * two main options | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * influence exiting game devs or filmmakers / ocean ' | ||
+ | * current strands | ||
+ | * coached lab space to develop game(s) and/or app(s) | ||
+ | * develop add ons to existing games | ||
+ | * develop games as tie ins to other games/ | ||
+ | * BBC docos, google ocean, natgeo, etc | ||
+ | * mainstream marine conservation game (cf. beyond (..?) rising tide - maxis?) | ||
+ | * games can also be used as fund-raising vehicles | ||
+ | * simple experiments to test ides -> scale | ||
+ | * possible direction | ||
+ | -> sim city like versions of initial scenarios (workshop 1) | ||
+ | * three existing options for progress / requiring feedback | ||
+ | * small lab games (c.f fish hackathon) | ||
+ | * advantage; existing format, easier to test assumptions with small games, process based learning | ||
+ | * disadvantage; | ||
+ | * full on game | ||
+ | * advantage; AR tech becoming cheaper & easier to create, existing research from BBC on AR in education, potentially wide audience, amplification. | ||
+ | * disadvantage; | ||
+ | * questions; target audience? SIM-MPA? | ||
+ | * marine game/film leadership | ||
+ | * advantage; might be scope for a 'think tank' with more general (less issue/ | ||
+ | good time for BBC Oceans, influence through others. how to maintain contact with influencers | ||
+ | * disadvantage; | ||
+ | * ZSL project, virtual Chagos, funding during 2016. British, controversial, | ||
+ | * interest | ||
+ | * giles, testing assumptions, | ||
+ | * heather, perhaps as a masters project for students {Exeter uni, Chagos project) | ||
+ | * mirella, perhaps more preliminary research to see which option is most promising | ||
+ | * MSC, existing contacts (octonauts) potential test audience. | ||
+ | * next steps; | ||
+ | * potential research questions, masters topics. | ||
+ | * sandy, sue & heather draft a few paragraphs re. research scope etc. "next week" | ||
+ | | ||
====Plastics project==== | ====Plastics project==== | ||
Line 53: | Line 128: | ||
{{> | {{> | ||
+ | * successful funding proposal | ||
+ | * mayoral election in may 2016 | ||
+ | * focus as a marine project rather than just about ' | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * closer look at what has failed, expected backlash, sustainability, | ||
+ | * required; project implementation plan, timeline, external deadlines. kickoff meeting (before xmas) | ||
+ | * collaborative structure; | ||
+ | * 2 ppl full time - project mgmt at ZSL (via Project Oceans), narrative & communication TEP | ||
+ | * FF interns & some staff for research & background, active mapping process | ||
+ | * governance? overview committee, advisory group | ||
+ | * connections with existing NGOs working in ' | ||
+ | * Emma Cunningham re. stakeholder interviews, industry, NGOs, etc | ||
+ | * how to ensure 'best advice' | ||
+ | * strategy for mayoral candidates | ||
+ | * establish list of allies, existing contacts and relevant conversations, | ||
+ | * any upcoming 'big things' | ||
+ | * start compling hideous facts about single use bottles | ||
+ | * potential case studies (selfridges, | ||
+ | * how do we explicitly test values based research? | ||
====Planning 2016==== | ====Planning 2016==== |