Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-11-27 10:36] – [Game On!] nik
+++ marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-11-27 10:59] – [Project Incubator] nik
@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23035387720}}\\
+(cross reference with Aniol's notes)
+  * ways to identify strategic lines of work
+  * list of relevant projects
+    * marine safe
+    * coastal partnership network
+    * Thames river academy (educational projects)
+    * beach watch
+    * capturing the value of our coast (citizen science, data collection)
+    * capacity building at FFI (new educational programmes, masters, adult ed. etc)
+    * strengthening NGO capacity in Portugal (aniol)
+    * common ground (community voice project followup, biz case for marine resource mgmt)
+    * MPA programme (increase in capacity for creating marine protected areas)
+    * (FFI co-management approach)
+    * sustainable seafood in Portugal (MCS & Client Earth - reducing unlawful fishing)
+    * ocean schools (ocean awareness as part of general knowledge, general education)
+    * #oceanoptismism (changing narrative around oceans -> more focus on successes & communication of best practice)
+    * Blue New Deal
+    * diverting EU marine funding to 'good things' (European funding opportunities)
+  * three main groupings
+    * opportunities around MPA & spatial planning, policy related
+    * schools, training & educational projects
+    * exporting knowledge & support / capacity building
+  * (global wave conference)
+  * capturing the value of our coast -> possible focus for various experiments, data collection & value testing
+  * rethinking projects in terms of value lens, changes of impact with contributions from other partners
+  * time-line and potential interactions between projects (dependencies....)
+  * next steps
+    * find specific ways for marine colab to inform existing and new projects, either as advisers,
+    * write up value space for each project -> further mapping
+    * Aniol to compile & reformat existing info by end of the week
+    * edits, additions and value prompt to be submitted by Dec. 4th
 ====Game On!====
@@ Line 70: / Line 104: @@
     * small lab games (c.f fish hackathon)
       * advantage; existing format, easier to test assumptions with small games, process based learning
-      * disadvantage; does a game actually 'work' as a way to develop connections to the oceans?,
+      * disadvantage; does a game actually 'work' as a way to develop connections to the oceans?, hackathon outcomes can be lacklustre. potentially limited impact.
-         hackathon outcomes can be lacklustre. potentially limited impact.
     * full on game
-      * advantage; AR tech becoming cheaper & easier to create, existing research from BBC on AR in education,
+      * advantage; AR tech becoming cheaper & easier to create, existing research from BBC on AR in education, potentially wide audience, amplification.
-         potentially wide audience, amplification.
       * disadvantage; high expectations, cost of development, educational games are usually boring, competitive
       * questions; target audience? SIM-MPA?
@@ Line 80: / Line 112: @@
       * advantage; might be scope for a 'think tank' with more general (less issue/agenda based) consulting,
          good time for BBC Oceans, influence through others. how to maintain contact with influencers
-      * disadvantage; 'Nemo effect' (clown fish), Disney often difficult to work with, span of control is extended,
+      * disadvantage; 'Nemo effect' (clown fish), Disney often difficult to work with, span of control is extended, possible dilution.
-         possible dilution.
   * ZSL project, virtual Chagos, funding during 2016. British, controversial, inaccessible.
   * interest