Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-11-27 11:02] – maja
+++ marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-12-01 11:24] – maja
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Facilitators: Maja Kuzmanovic, Nik Gaffney, Vali Lalioti
+This is the last workshop of the first year of [[start|Marine CoLAB]]. Louisa Hooper compared it to standing at the seashore at low tide, with rocks and mud emerging under water, so we can begin to see the peaks, as well as what underlies them. One of the biggest challenges for this workshop and the coming year is how to do less with game-changing effectiveness. It is important to look at the big picture as well well as the practicalities of the months and year(s) to come.
@@ Line 14: / Line 16: @@
 ==== Framing ====
-This is the last workshop of the first year of Marine CoLAB. Louisa Hooper compared it to standing at the seashore at low tide, with rocks and mud emerging under water, so we can begin to see the peaks, as well as what underlies them. One of the biggest challenges for this workshop and the coming year is how to do less with game-changing effectiveness. It is important to look at the big picture as well well as the practicalities of the months and year(s) to come.
 Maja Kuzmanovic looked back over the notes of the past year and distilled a few points from previous discussions on the future of Marine CoLAB, that can be used as a starting point or a point of discussion, when looking forward to 2016 and beyond. Marine CoLAB participants are keen to seize opportunities to reframe challenges and refresh whole systems. They do this by being a part of trusted collaborations and networks. After a year of working together, the facilitators added that the participants are very keen to and good at designing and working on projects.
@@ Line 107: / Line 107: @@
   * Creative communications - communicating complex concepts, training…
-== Organisational buy-in ==
+== Connect to organisations ==
   * Dedicated staff
@@ Line 114: / Line 114: @@
   * Understanding how to manage and maximise positive feedback into participating organisations
+=== What can we improve? ===
-====Future of Marine CoLAB====
+Get better at knowing "who we are, where we go and how we do it".
+== Organisational buy-in ==
+  * Engage not just individuals, but whole organisations in Marine CoLAB. This could be accomplished by:
+    * Clarifying the strategic lines of work of Marine CoLAB (3 lines?)
+    * Offering value add (e.g. building effective collaborations)
+    * Try to find a common agenda that all organisations would be interested in
+  * If Marine CoLAB activities can fit into day-to-day agendas of existing work in the participating organisations, more time can be freed to work on them
+  * Think about the structure of the collaboration and how it could overlap with organisational missions, activities and strategies.
+== Sustainability ==
+  * innovation
+  * collaboration
+  * projects
+  * Core funding is likely to be needed for Marine CoLAB as a whole, as some of the organisations are only funded on a project basis, so do not have the capacity to offer people’s time. While it is important to get Marine CoLAB projects funded, the benefit of the collaboration needs the CoLAB as a whole funded as well.
+== Communication ==
+(within organisations, with stakeholders)
+  * Focus outwards
+  * Create a thought piece explaining something like "this is the benefit of 12 months of Marine CoLAB", using the plastics project and other key outcomes as milestones.
+Communicate how it affected ways of working, what effects it had on specific projects, potential long term value for oceans, etc.
+====Future of Marine CoLAB====
+{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23248481071}}\\
 ====Mission / MIX====
-{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23248578401/ ?maxheight=400}}{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23331148065/ ?maxheight=400}}{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/22963124089/ ?maxheight=400}}
+( cross reference w. Giles' notes )
+  * network focused on values based solutions to protect & restore the ocean
+  * a collective is a powerful means to address the urgent need for humans to value the oceans & drive change
+  * we aim to achieve a shift in how the  ocean is valued by individuals and society to improve ocean health
+  * recognising existing values, rather than changing or creating 'new' values
+  * we tackle the issues by collaborating, incubating, innovating, catalysing and influencing
+  * s/collection/network
+  * values based -> USP
+  * requires time-frame?
+  * we aim to achieve
+    * organisations all have a theory of change, glue is the values based piece...
+    * as a lab, how do we experiment with strategies?
+    * economic shift? perceptual shifts?
+  * clearer ideas for methods to 'amplify' existing values
+  * behaviour shift as a result of uncovering existing values, finding where values & behaviour are at odds.
+  * something for 2016 -> values based campaigning (chris rose ? also NEF)
 ====Values based approach====
 {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23331171505}}\\
+There is a need to find a language all Marine CoLAB participants understand, paying attention to jargon. There is a difference between the term "values" and "value", both are part of one whole, but can be understood quite differently. Sue’s session focused on values that connect people and places. What is important in a place? Values are developed through experience and interaction, and form the heartfelt connections between the people and a place, adding to human wellbeing. From these connections "cultural ecosystem services" beyond monetary value can be developed. They include a wider context, create whole ecosystems of interconnected disciplines (e.g. conservation, economy, mythology, wellbeing…) and incorporate different ways of talking and telling stories about a place.  They deliver benefits to human wellbeing and are connected to other ecosystem services.
+In order to uncover deeper values, we need to start with basic connectedness (of people and places, different disciplines, different people. This can form a glue, a common basis and shared understanding.
+  * developing a shared language based around values we can use to communicate within the group
+  * 'values of people' <--> 'value of the oceans'
+  * uncovering existing values, aligning values
+  * issue based theory of change -> value based
+  * bringing various voices, with various values into discussion
 ====Project Incubator====