Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-11-27 11:27] – [Mission / MIX] nikmarine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-12-01 11:55] – [Framing] maja
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 Facilitators: Maja Kuzmanovic, Nik Gaffney, Vali Lalioti  Facilitators: Maja Kuzmanovic, Nik Gaffney, Vali Lalioti 
 +
 +This is the last workshop of the first year of [[start|Marine CoLAB]]. Louisa Hooper compared it to standing at the seashore at low tide, with rocks and mud emerging under water, so we can begin to see the peaks, as well as what underlies them. One of the biggest challenges for this workshop and the coming year is how to do less with game-changing effectiveness. It is important to look at the big picture as well well as the practicalities of the months and year(s) to come. 
  
  
Line 14: Line 16:
 ==== Framing ==== ==== Framing ====
  
- 
-This is the last workshop of the first year of Marine CoLAB. Louisa Hooper compared it to standing at the seashore at low tide, with rocks and mud emerging under water, so we can begin to see the peaks, as well as what underlies them. One of the biggest challenges for this workshop and the coming year is how to do less with game-changing effectiveness. It is important to look at the big picture as well well as the practicalities of the months and year(s) to come.  
  
 Maja Kuzmanovic looked back over the notes of the past year and distilled a few points from previous discussions on the future of Marine CoLAB, that can be used as a starting point or a point of discussion, when looking forward to 2016 and beyond. Marine CoLAB participants are keen to seize opportunities to reframe challenges and refresh whole systems. They do this by being a part of trusted collaborations and networks. After a year of working together, the facilitators added that the participants are very keen to and good at designing and working on projects.  Maja Kuzmanovic looked back over the notes of the past year and distilled a few points from previous discussions on the future of Marine CoLAB, that can be used as a starting point or a point of discussion, when looking forward to 2016 and beyond. Marine CoLAB participants are keen to seize opportunities to reframe challenges and refresh whole systems. They do this by being a part of trusted collaborations and networks. After a year of working together, the facilitators added that the participants are very keen to and good at designing and working on projects. 
Line 23: Line 23:
 Over the course of several workshops, a range of challenges for Marine CoLAB were identified, including systemic change, public engagement, valuing (cultural dimensions) of oceans, perception of marine conservation, transparency of marine industries and plastic pollution of oceans. The facilitators observed an additional challenge: developing a sustainable support network beyond and in-between projects. This is something that began to be addressed in Lisbon and continues in this workshop.  Over the course of several workshops, a range of challenges for Marine CoLAB were identified, including systemic change, public engagement, valuing (cultural dimensions) of oceans, perception of marine conservation, transparency of marine industries and plastic pollution of oceans. The facilitators observed an additional challenge: developing a sustainable support network beyond and in-between projects. This is something that began to be addressed in Lisbon and continues in this workshop. 
  
-Finally, before delving into the futures, mission, values and a range of experiments, projects and activities, it might be helpful to remind ourselves of the CGF’s goal for Marine CoLAB: **To communicate the role of the ocean for human wellbeing (particularly connecting natural sciences and economy).**. +Finally, before delving into the futures, mission, values and a range of experiments, projects and activities, it might be helpful to remind ourselves of the CGF’s goal for Marine CoLAB: **To communicate the role of the ocean for human wellbeing** (particularly connecting natural sciences and economy).  
 + 
 +==== Agenda ==== 
 + 
 +In the morning the participants focused om Marine CoLAB as a whole. Beginning with reflecting on **Marine CoLAB so far**: what worked and what needs more work. Grounded in this experience they moved into a visioning process lead by Giles to clarify the overall **Marine CoLAB vision and mission**. At the end of the morning Sue took the group through a beautiful presentation and discussion of the **values based approach**, as a lens that can be used to shape and evaluate projects, experiments and the initiative itself. In the afternoon, the focus was on **Marine CoLAB project incubator**, beginning with a broad mapping of existing and emerging projects by participating organisations which could be relevant to Marine CoLAB facilitated by Aniol. Two following sessions discussed the two projects that emerged from previous workshops: possible directions for GameOn guided by Sandy and a working/planning session for the Plastic Bottles project lead by Heather. At the end of the day we came back to **Marine CoLAB's future in 2016**. 
 + 
 +{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23305011056}}\\
  
  
Line 107: Line 113:
   * Creative communications - communicating complex concepts, training…   * Creative communications - communicating complex concepts, training…
  
-== Organisational buy-in ==+== Connect to organisations ==
  
   * Dedicated staff   * Dedicated staff
Line 113: Line 119:
   * Us as individuals in CoLAB vs us as organisation; thinking about organisational/institutional buy-in and engagement; using more of the entire skillsets of organisations (e.g. corporate responsibility, 'creative' legal approaches, etc.; connecting beyond individuals to others in our organisations; additional collaborators to deliver projects (buy-in); would like to draw on expertise of colleagues    * Us as individuals in CoLAB vs us as organisation; thinking about organisational/institutional buy-in and engagement; using more of the entire skillsets of organisations (e.g. corporate responsibility, 'creative' legal approaches, etc.; connecting beyond individuals to others in our organisations; additional collaborators to deliver projects (buy-in); would like to draw on expertise of colleagues 
   * Understanding how to manage and maximise positive feedback into participating organisations   * Understanding how to manage and maximise positive feedback into participating organisations
 +
 +=== What can we improve? ===
 +
 +
 +Get better at knowing "who we are, where we go and how we do it"
 +
 +== Organisational buy-in ==
 +  * Engage not just individuals, but whole organisations in Marine CoLAB. This could be accomplished by:
 +    * Clarifying the strategic lines of work of Marine CoLAB (3 lines?)
 +    * Offering value add (e.g. building effective collaborations)
 +    * Try to find a common agenda that all organisations would be interested in
 +  * If Marine CoLAB activities can fit into day-to-day agendas of existing work in the participating organisations, more time can be freed to work on them
 +  * Think about the structure of the collaboration and how it could overlap with organisational missions, activities and strategies.
 +
 +== Sustainability ==
 +  * innovation
 +  * collaboration
 +  * projects
 +  * Core funding is likely to be needed for Marine CoLAB as a whole, as some of the organisations are only funded on a project basis, so do not have the capacity to offer people’s time. While it is important to get Marine CoLAB projects funded, the benefit of the collaboration needs the CoLAB as a whole funded as well. 
 +
 +== Communication == 
 +
 +(within organisations, with stakeholders)
 +  * Focus outwards
 +  * Create a thought piece explaining something like "this is the benefit of 12 months of Marine CoLAB", using the plastics project and other key outcomes as milestones.
 +Communicate how it affected ways of working, what effects it had on specific projects, potential long term value for oceans, etc. 
  
  
 ====Future of Marine CoLAB==== ====Future of Marine CoLAB====
  
-( see stories & photos )+{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23248481071}}\\
 ====Mission / MIX==== ====Mission / MIX====
  
Line 146: Line 178:
  
 {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23331171505}}\\ {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23331171505}}\\
 +
 +There is a need to find a language all Marine CoLAB participants understand, paying attention to jargon. There is a difference between the term "values" and "value", both are part of one whole, but can be understood quite differently. Sue’s session focused on values that connect people and places. What is important in a place? Values are developed through experience and interaction, and form the heartfelt connections between the people and a place, adding to human wellbeing. From these connections "cultural ecosystem services" beyond monetary value can be developed. They include a wider context, create whole ecosystems of interconnected disciplines (e.g. conservation, economy, mythology, wellbeing…) and incorporate different ways of talking and telling stories about a place.  They deliver benefits to human wellbeing and are connected to other ecosystem services.
 +
 +In order to uncover deeper values, we need to start with basic connectedness (of people and places, different disciplines, different people. This can form a glue, a common basis and shared understanding. 
  
   * developing a shared language based around values we can use to communicate within the group   * developing a shared language based around values we can use to communicate within the group
  • marine_colab/workshop_20151125.txt
  • Last modified: 2016-08-10 09:48
  • by nik