Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-12-01 12:50] – [Agenda] majamarine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-12-03 10:21] – [Values based approach] maja
Line 153: Line 153:
 ====Mission / MIX==== ====Mission / MIX====
  
-( cross reference w. Giles' notes )+Marine CoLAB is a network focused on values based solutions to protect and restore the ocean. We exist because a collective is a powerful means to address the urgent need for humans to value the ocean and drive change. We aim to achieve a shift in how the ocean is valued by individuals and society to improve ocean health. We tackle these issues by collaborating, incubating, innovating, catalysing and influencing.
  
-  * network focused on values based solutions to protect & restore the ocean +  * Value shift: what is Marine CoLAB’s theory of change? All participating organisations have one, but the glue could be the 'values based approach’   
-  * a collective is a powerful means to address the urgent need for humans to value the oceans & drive change +    * Recognising existing values, rather than changing or creating 'new' values 
-  * we aim to achieve a shift in how the  ocean is valued by individuals and society to improve ocean health+    * What is the timeframe?
  
-  * recognising existing values, rather than changing or creating 'new' values+Glue: values based → USP → what is the BIGGER SHIFT the lab wants to focus on (e.g. climate change, fossil fuels and oceans - a big goal to strive towards)? What are the relevant values for this goal? As a lab, how do we experiment with strategies?  Is it economic transformation the Marine COLAB is looking for? Perceptual shifts, cultural change, or something else?
  
-  * we tackle the issues by collaborating, incubating, innovating, catalysing and influencing+When talking about a values based approach, there could be two possibilities: 
 +  * Recognising and amplifying values: the CoLAB needs clearer ideas for methods to 'amplify' existing values. Behavioural change can be a result of recognising, uncovering & understanding existing values, as well as finding where values of oceans and people are at odds and experimenting with ways to make them not at odds any longer.  
 +  * Changing values: a more pro-active process, although perhaps an impossibility - possibly better to focus on changing behaviours instead.  
 + 
 +  
 +To do in 2016 → look at values based campaigning [[http://www.campaignstrategy.org/|Chris Rose]] and also NEF’s approaches. 
 + 
 + 
 +( cross reference w. Giles' notes )
  
-  * s/collection/network 
-  * values based -> USP 
-  * requires time-frame?  
  
-  * we aim to achieve 
-    * organisations all have a theory of change, glue is the values based piece... 
-    * as a lab, how do we experiment with strategies? 
-    * economic shift? perceptual shifts? 
-      
-  * clearer ideas for methods to 'amplify' existing values 
-  * behaviour shift as a result of uncovering existing values, finding where values & behaviour are at odds. 
-  * something for 2016 -> values based campaigning (chris rose ? also NEF) 
  
 ====Values based approach==== ====Values based approach====
Line 180: Line 177:
 {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23331171505}}\\ {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23331171505}}\\
  
-There is a need to find a language all Marine CoLAB participants understand, paying attention to jargon. There is a difference between the term "values" and "value", both are part of one whole, but can be understood quite differently. Sue’s session focused on values that connect people and places. What is important in a place? Values are developed through experience and interaction, and form the heartfelt connections between the people and a place, adding to human wellbeing. From these connections "cultural ecosystem services" beyond monetary value can be developed. They include a wider context, create whole ecosystems of interconnected disciplines (e.g. conservation, economy, mythology, wellbeing…) and incorporate different ways of talking and telling stories about a place.  They deliver benefits to human wellbeing and are connected to other ecosystem services.+== Presentation by Sue Ranger == 
 + 
 +There is a need to find a language all Marine CoLAB participants understand, paying attention to jargon. There is a difference between the term "values" and "value", both are part of one whole, but can be understood quite differently. Sue’s presentation focused on values that connect people and places. What is important in a place? Values are developed through experience and interaction, and form the heartfelt connections between the people and a place, adding to human wellbeing. From these connections "cultural ecosystem services" beyond monetary value can be developed. They include a wider context, create whole ecosystems of interconnected disciplines (e.g. conservation, economy, mythology, wellbeing…) and incorporate different ways of talking and telling stories about a place.  They deliver benefits to human wellbeing and are connected to other ecosystem services.
  
 In order to uncover deeper values, we need to start with basic connectedness (of people and places, different disciplines, different people. This can form a glue, a common basis and shared understanding.  In order to uncover deeper values, we need to start with basic connectedness (of people and places, different disciplines, different people. This can form a glue, a common basis and shared understanding. 
Line 189: Line 188:
   * issue based theory of change -> value based   * issue based theory of change -> value based
   * bringing various voices, with various values into discussion   * bringing various voices, with various values into discussion
 +
 +== Discussion ==
 +
 +The values based approach is the hallmark of Marine CoLAB, a prism or lens through which the LAB and its activities are designed and assessed. Filling the gap between the values of humans and the value of oceans. The value of oceans tends to be misunderstood and needs to be communicated differently. An **iconic campaign** might help, as well as focusing on issues by describing the value of oceans, such as the plastics project and other **values based experiments**, that would include learning, capturing, evaluation, etc. 
 +
 +There are different methods to approach values, depending on the theory of change applied. Should Marine CoLAB have one or more theory of change? Is there a generic TOC or a range of context specific theories that can mobilise new voices and gather evidence? Is the uniqueness of Marine CoLAB’s TOC important? Would it not be more relevant to focus on adding value? 
 +
 +What are the values of Marine CoLAB? Could **shared values** be Marine CoLAB’s focus at all times and across all projects?  Is there a spectrum of existing values that are shared (instrinsic/extrinsic, economic & cultural, individual & collective, etc.)? By working with a range of different values this approach can focus on whichever value catalyses different target groups - starting from their existing values, connecting them to oceans and each other, making the values collective and shared. 
 +
 +How to begin using a values based approach in Marine CoLAB: **learn by doing**:
 +  * invite speakers
 +  * share readings
 +  * personal exercises (akin to Sue’s values presentation)
 +  * incorporating it in projects
 +  * values a part of all Marine CoLAB communication 
  
 ====Project Incubator==== ====Project Incubator====
Line 203: Line 217:
 List of relevant projects List of relevant projects
  
-== MPA and spatial planning ==+== MPAs and marine planning ==
   * [[http://www.marinesafe.org/|Marine Safe]]; a campaign to remove pollutants from personal care products   * [[http://www.marinesafe.org/|Marine Safe]]; a campaign to remove pollutants from personal care products
   * Common ground: [[http://www.sussex-ifca.gov.uk/repository/230115_Merged%20outputs_For%20web+participants.pdf|Community Voice Project]] followup, business case for marine resource management   * Common ground: [[http://www.sussex-ifca.gov.uk/repository/230115_Merged%20outputs_For%20web+participants.pdf|Community Voice Project]] followup, business case for marine resource management
Line 224: Line 238:
      * Related: strengthening NGO capacity in Portugal (Aniol)      * Related: strengthening NGO capacity in Portugal (Aniol)
   * Diverting EU marine funding to 'good things' (European funding opportunities)   * Diverting EU marine funding to 'good things' (European funding opportunities)
 +  * http://www.frameworksinstitute.org/|Frameworks]] research
  
- +== Next steps ==
-=== Next steps ===+
     * Aniol to compile & reformat existing info by end of the week, make a [[Project Incubator Form]]     * Aniol to compile & reformat existing info by end of the week, make a [[Project Incubator Form]]
     * Edits, additions and value prompt to be submitted by Dec. 4th     * Edits, additions and value prompt to be submitted by Dec. 4th
  • marine_colab/workshop_20151125.txt
  • Last modified: 2016-08-10 09:48
  • by nik