Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-12-03 11:27] – [Mission / MIX] maja | marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-12-03 13:49] – [Framing] maja | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| ==== Framing ==== | ==== Framing ==== | ||
| - | + | The morning began by looking | |
| - | Maja Kuzmanovic looked | + | |
| At the very first workshop the participants designed a range of possible future scenarios for Marine CoLAB and the worlds in which it would exist. The different futures had two things in common: Marine CoLAB would be integrating values and innovation, as well as establishing and strengthening connections (between the ocean and society, between business and governments, | At the very first workshop the participants designed a range of possible future scenarios for Marine CoLAB and the worlds in which it would exist. The different futures had two things in common: Marine CoLAB would be integrating values and innovation, as well as establishing and strengthening connections (between the ocean and society, between business and governments, | ||
| Line 211: | Line 210: | ||
| What are the values of Marine CoLAB? Could **shared values** be Marine CoLAB’s focus at all times and across all projects? | What are the values of Marine CoLAB? Could **shared values** be Marine CoLAB’s focus at all times and across all projects? | ||
| - | How to begin using a values based approach in Marine CoLAB: **learn by doing**: | + | How to begin using a values based approach in Marine CoLAB: **learn by doing**! |
| + | |||
| + | ==Next steps == | ||
| * invite speakers | * invite speakers | ||
| * share readings | * share readings | ||
| Line 302: | Line 303: | ||
| - | Next steps; | + | ==Next steps== |
| * more preliminary research to see which option is most promising | * more preliminary research to see which option is most promising | ||
| * Sandy, Sue & Heather: Potential research questions, masters topics for students of Exeter University: "next week" to draft a few paragraphs re. research scope etc. Envisaged results: a " | * Sandy, Sue & Heather: Potential research questions, masters topics for students of Exeter University: "next week" to draft a few paragraphs re. research scope etc. Envisaged results: a " | ||
| Line 317: | Line 318: | ||
| {{> | {{> | ||
| - | | + | |
| - | * mayoral election in may 2016 | + | Working session of the now fully funded (CGF & OAK Foundation) Marine CoLAB project: campaign to make London free of Single Use Plastic Bottles. |
| - | * focus as a marine project rather than just about ' | + | |
| - | * " | + | Three topics to touch on: |
| - | | + | |
| - | * required; project implementation plan, timeline, external deadlines. kickoff meeting (before xmas) | + | * Reality check (commitments, |
| - | * collaborative | + | |
| - | * 2 ppl full time - project mgmt at ZSL (via Project Oceans), narrative & communication TEP | + | |
| - | * FF interns | + | ==Values== |
| - | * governance? overview committee, advisory group | + | |
| - | * connections with existing NGOs working in ' | + | What will make individuals change behaviour (intrinsic, economic…)? |
| - | * Emma Cunningham re. stakeholder interviews, industry, NGOs, etc | + | |
| - | * how to ensure 'best advice' | + | * How to avoid industry backlash? |
| - | * strategy for mayoral candidates | + | * How to make it sustainable? |
| - | * establish | + | * Focus as a marine project rather than just about ' |
| - | * any upcoming 'big things' | + | * Have to have a closer look at what has failed |
| - | * start compling hideous facts about single use bottles | + | * how to ensure 'best advice' |
| - | * potential case studies (selfridges, | + | * start compling hideous facts about single use bottles |
| - | * how do we explicitly test values based research? | + | * Design campaign to include values as an essential part of it: continue discussion at the brainstorming meeting in December. |
| + | * How to explicitly test values based research? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Reality Check == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The funding proposal was successful: now a few urgent things to do: | ||
| + | * By 11 December 2015, All: Re:read the proposal, agree on commitments and/or adapt if needed. | ||
| + | * ASAP: Heather, Steve, Louisa: paperwork | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Collaborative | ||
| + | * Project management | ||
| + | * Governance: overview committee, advisory group - needs to be finalised | ||
| + | * Recruiting: By 16 December: Heather | ||
| + | * January: interview applicants | ||
| + | * Compile a project team ASAP | ||
| + | * Giles/FF: has staff for research & background, active mapping process. Connect FF’s interns to work on researching case studies (Bristol (tap friendly, public fountains…) Selfridges, ZSL, etc), C40, cities as chanpions, COP, tourism, Blue Bell… | ||
| + | * (Longer term): Form advisory group with different stakeholders (Sue has ideas) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Implementation plan | ||
| + | * 16 December: Initial startup meeting: Heather, Mirella, Amy, Giles, Louisa | ||
| + | * 12 January (from 2pm) Full planning meeting with other experts from organisations | ||
| + | * After January plan at least one meeting per month | ||
| + | * Short term focus: Mayoral election in May 2016: need strategy for mayoral candidates - Campaigns are written NOW (Louisa has a few people who should be engaged in this): | ||
| + | * How to get a meeting? Exploratory conversations to identify what is the opportunity for the candidates. | ||
| + | * Offer solutions/ | ||
| + | * Longer term: Systems Mapping exercise and stakeholder conversations (linked to advisory group) | ||
| + | * Identify target groups (from systems mapping) | ||
| + | * Outsource research: to e.g. frameworks research - additional funding will be available for this research from CGF. Which questions need asking? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Link to related initiatives, | ||
| + | * Research | ||
| + | |||
| ====Planning 2016==== | ====Planning 2016==== | ||
| - | * 10 days of time is covered | + | 10 days of time per organisation |
| - | * how best to structure the time? | + | |
| - | * smaller, structured meetings around particular topics/ | + | ==Marine CoLAB as a collaborative network== |
| - | * aggregating projects (mapping), specific project (plastics) | + | * What does a lab community look like? |
| - | * discuss learning which emerges from projects | + | * Collaboration |
| - | * what can we teach each other | + | * Added value of open thinking space, facilitated structure |
| - | * sometime for thinking about wider issues, larger context, incubation of vague ideas. | + | * Further work required |
| - | * time to proactively communicate, | + | |
| - | * better integration of partners into project proposals -> more explicit collaborations | + | |
| - | * clarify evidence base for the lab, both process and projects | + | |
| - | * collaboration | + | |
| - | * how can new/other partners get involved in the future? | + | |
| - | * more focus on strategy, strategy | + | |
| * 4~6 days of meetings of entire group | * 4~6 days of meetings of entire group | ||
| - | * (cf. global strategy for sharks) | + | * some time for thinking about wider issues, larger context, incubation of vague ideas (cf. global strategy for sharks) |
| - | * added value of open thinking space, facilitated structure | + | * What can we teach each other? Discuss learning which emerges from projects |
| - | * further work required | + | * More focus on strategy, strategy |
| - | * circulate set of objectives, further ideas | + | * To do: circulate set of objectives, further ideas towards a governance structure, business and operational models (next workshop early 2016) |
| - | * what does a lab community look like? | + | |
| - | * strategy for engagement? | + | == Marine CoLAB Activities / Projects == |
| - | * clear criteria for 'a lab project'? | + | * Smaller, structured meetings around particular topics/ |
| + | * Aggregating projects (from existing/ | ||
| + | * Clarify | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Communication and stakeholder engagement == | ||
| + | * Time to proactively communicate! | ||
| + | * Clarify evidence base for the lab, both process and projects | ||
| + | * How can new/other partners get involved in the future? Strategy for engagement? | ||
| + | * Better integration of partners into project proposals -> more explicit collaborations | ||
| + | |||
| ====Next Steps==== | ====Next Steps==== | ||
nik