Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
marine_colab:workshop_20160121 [2016-01-25 18:19] – [The value of Marine CoLAB] 213.211.142.223marine_colab:workshop_20160121 [2016-01-26 12:08] – [The LAB Approach] nik
Line 140: Line 140:
   * **Observe and Reflect**: What insights do you now have about your questions? What have we learnt? //How do we learn? This is still the weakest link for Marine CoLAB, it needs more emphasis on 'observing and reflecting’, in order to understand how can Marine CoLAB could exist in it's own right, to become self sufficient and to design better projects. How do we evaluate projects and activities of the LAB and the CoLAB itself?//   * **Observe and Reflect**: What insights do you now have about your questions? What have we learnt? //How do we learn? This is still the weakest link for Marine CoLAB, it needs more emphasis on 'observing and reflecting’, in order to understand how can Marine CoLAB could exist in it's own right, to become self sufficient and to design better projects. How do we evaluate projects and activities of the LAB and the CoLAB itself?//
  
-( ( ( nik to add diagram ) ) ) +{{:marine_colab:research-action-cycle.gif?nolink |}}
  
 Before coming up with a plan for 2016 and a longer term strategy for Marine CoLAB in 2017 and beyond, the action research cycle could be used to evaluate the open questions, which can be tackled in the Marine CoLAB sessions in February and March, which will focus on **how will we operationalise the LAB**.  Before coming up with a plan for 2016 and a longer term strategy for Marine CoLAB in 2017 and beyond, the action research cycle could be used to evaluate the open questions, which can be tackled in the Marine CoLAB sessions in February and March, which will focus on **how will we operationalise the LAB**. 
  • marine_colab/workshop_20160121.txt
  • Last modified: 2016-08-10 08:11
  • by nik