Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
michka:project_definition [2014-01-20 14:23] – michka | michka:project_definition [2014-01-20 14:35] – michka | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
After more days of notebook content gathering, a bigger amount of post-its allowed to **define sub-categories** to the first basic classification scheme. Some categories where restructured when balance in the content would change with the growing number of post-its. | After more days of notebook content gathering, a bigger amount of post-its allowed to **define sub-categories** to the first basic classification scheme. Some categories where restructured when balance in the content would change with the growing number of post-its. | ||
- | ===Practical FoAM2013 Table=== | + | As more post-its were added to the wall, **further sub-categories** where created, some **specific contents** were highlighted by being put on post-its with different colors. The final result of the post-it classification looked like the following picture - where you can only see the classification of the Metabolhomics category. |
- | ====TODO==== | + | {{ : |
- | > Processing language: essential key words and essential anti-key words. | + | ===Mindmaps=== |
+ | Post-its have mainly been used as precursors of mindmaps. Post-its are quite handy because they - theoretically - can be re-positionned several times and still stick to the surface. When dealing with large amounts of content to classify, I think that post-its are handy for three reasons: | ||
+ | - You get physical with your ideas | ||
+ | - You are able to do and undo classification schemes in very intuitive and quick way | ||
+ | - You can keep an holoptic view more easily with a big wall than with a small screen | ||
+ | ====TODO==== | ||
+ | > Processing language: essential key words and essential anti-key words. | ||
+ | > Getting physical TD link |