This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| michka:research:microbial_fuel_cells:marseille3 [2014-10-08 14:27] – michka | michka:research:microbial_fuel_cells:marseille3 [2014-10-08 14:39] (current) – michka | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| + | //Clay sampling spot - Niolon, France.// | ||
| - | * **Substrate**: | ||
| - | * Volume: 80*30*2 cm3 | ||
| + | * **Substrate**: | ||
| + | * Volume: 80*30*2 cm3 | ||
| * **Container**: | * **Container**: | ||
| * **Proton Exchange Membrane**: printer paper with low amount of ink. | * **Proton Exchange Membrane**: printer paper with low amount of ink. | ||
| Line 79: | Line 80: | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| + | //Marine sediments sampling spot - Marseille, France// | ||
| + | |||
| * **Substrate**: | * **Substrate**: | ||
| Line 106: | Line 109: | ||
| Even though the multimeter was connected the wrong way (+ on anode, - on cathode), we first had positive (and quite high) current and voltage value. Is this due to remanant charges from the PC battery ? | Even though the multimeter was connected the wrong way (+ on anode, - on cathode), we first had positive (and quite high) current and voltage value. Is this due to remanant charges from the PC battery ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Conclusion== | ||
| + | |||
| + | From both these expriments and those conducted in Bruxelles, we can conclude that the MFC behavior improves and stabilizes with time. | ||
| + | |||
| + | As the "pile micrboienne marseillaise" | ||
| + | |||
| + | Using newspaper or cardboard as a Proton Exchange Membrane seems fine. | ||
| + | |||
| + | New long-term experiments should be conducted to test other parameters, including more broadly available electrode materials. | ||