Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- michka:research:microbial_fuel_cells:marseille3 [2014-10-08 14:28] – michka
+++ michka:research:microbial_fuel_cells:marseille3 [2014-10-08 14:39] (current) – michka
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 {{ :michka:research:microbial_fuel_cells:dscf6377.jpg?300 |Clay Sampling Location - Niolon, France}}
-Clay sampling spot - Niolon, France.
+//Clay sampling spot - Niolon, France.//
@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 {{ :michka:research:microbial_fuel_cells:dscf6389.jpg?300 |}}
-Marine sediments sampling spot - Marseille, France
+//Marine sediments sampling spot - Marseille, France//
@@ Line 109: / Line 109: @@
 Even though the multimeter was connected the wrong way (+ on anode, - on cathode), we first had positive (and quite high) current and voltage value. Is this due to remanant charges from the PC battery ?
+==Conclusion==
+From both these expriments and those conducted in Bruxelles, we can conclude that the MFC behavior improves and stabilizes with time.
+As the "pile micrboienne marseillaise" increases its performance way quicker than the "Crate Design #2" It seems that a better mcirobial & nutrient source induces quicker results.
+Using newspaper or cardboard as a Proton Exchange Membrane seems fine.
+New long-term experiments should be conducted to test other parameters, including more broadly available electrode materials.