Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
open_sauces_errata [2010-04-14 00:53] – alkan | open_sauces_errata [2010-07-07 13:45] – <del>fixed</del> some things nik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* < | * < | ||
* < | * < | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) === | ||
+ | * changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions | ||
+ | * pp76. recipe layout/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === draft #26 (aka open_sauces_draft.20100425.pdf) === | ||
+ | |||
+ | * pp 12-13. taste of brussels. if possible this page should look a bit archaic, with images from old herbaria and/or beer ads (see email for examples) | ||
+ | * pp 18-19. frills on parentheses very good on this page. background on this page could be a bit dusty (dukkah dust) | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work" | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * i like the idea of the formatting of the ingredients sections, but somehow the combination of ingredients with and without preceding quantities looks confusing to me… especially where one ingredient listing spills over into multiple lines. -- please add details/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === draft #31 === | ||
+ | * document-wide | ||
+ | * decide upon //au bain-marie// | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * p 7 | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * heading "Note to the readers on how to get involved" | ||
+ | * p 18. correct table formatting for " | ||
+ | * p 25 | ||
+ | * consider reflowing to avoid the two-line widow in paragraph 3? | ||
+ | * p 28. < | ||
+ | * p 41. < | ||
+ | * pp 42-43 | ||
+ | * spacing here still seems off to me | ||
+ | * p 47. < | ||
+ | * p 49 | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * p 56 | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * p 61 | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * p 74 | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * i just noticed… the coloured tabs at page corners have no bleed. i don't know if this is intentional or not, but nor do i know why you // | ||
+ | |||
+ | * also don't forget to make the text more legible in the " | ||
=== still waiting... === | === still waiting... === | ||
* check all logos | * check all logos | ||
- | * check E numbers | + | * check E numbers |
* check chemical notation | * check chemical notation | ||
+ | * only one or two of these have ended up in the publication, | ||
* check footnotes | * check footnotes | ||
* check IPA for ' | * check IPA for ' | ||
Line 23: | Line 79: | ||
* check urls for accurcy & consistency | * check urls for accurcy & consistency | ||
* check footnote consistency | * check footnote consistency | ||
+ | * the few footnotes there are now look fine. maybe consider using a numeral in sneha' | ||
+ | * check libarynth and foam -> opensauces.cc urls | ||