Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- open_sauces_errata [2010-04-22 13:24] – 83.101.52.159
+++ open_sauces_errata [2010-04-26 16:24] – 83.101.33.239
@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
   * speaking of this, something has bothered me a little about the stylised braces. perhaps they seem somewhat too imposing. i don't know how it would work, but i wonder if reducing their opacity would be an option… or changing their colour?
   * because the the graphic behind the sourcing paragraph on (pdf) page 9 is not aligned to the text, on first glance it looked to me like the text was meant to be highlighted
-  * speaking of chevrons: even though in bernard's article they are 'references' and not 'links', they are serving the same function so why not put the little blue chevrons next to them like everywhere else?
+  * <del>speaking of chevrons: even though in bernard's article they are 'references' and not 'links', they are serving the same function so why not put the little blue chevrons next to them like everywhere else?<del>done.
   * speaking of braces, the one on (pdf) page 22 overlaps the text in an unseemly fashion!
@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 === draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) ===
   * changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions
+  * pp76. recipe layout/formatting
+=== draft #26 (aka open_sauces_draft.20100425.pdf) ===
+  * pp 12-13. taste of brussels. if possible this page should look a bit archaic, with images from old herbaria and/or beer ads (see email for examples)
+  * pp 18-19. frills on parentheses very good on this page. background on this page could be a bit dusty (dukkah dust)
+  * pp 49. change amounts in recipe to relative amounts in Stuffed Gol Gappa Balls (see email)
+  * pp 60-61. Femke didn't want any images with her text. The drawing should go with the recipe on the next page anyway.
+  * pp 60-61. needs page number
+  * pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable?