Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
open_sauces_errata [2010-04-26 17:17] – nik | open_sauces_errata [2010-04-27 01:22] – 203.26.122.12 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* check urls for accurcy & consistency | * check urls for accurcy & consistency | ||
* check footnote consistency | * check footnote consistency | ||
- | |||
- | === misc === | ||
- | poking my nose where it shouldn' | ||
- | |||
- | * i like the green chevrons, but i wonder if they work with the existing devices and designs | ||
- | * speaking of this, something has bothered me a little about the stylised braces. perhaps they seem somewhat too imposing. i don't know how it would work, but i wonder if reducing their opacity would be an option… or changing their colour? | ||
- | * because the the graphic behind the sourcing paragraph on (pdf) page 9 is not aligned to the text, on first glance it looked to me like the text was meant to be highlighted | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * speaking of braces, the one on (pdf) page 22 overlaps the text in an unseemly fashion! | ||
Line 48: | Line 39: | ||
* pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work" | * pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work" | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | * p 83 change " | ||
+ | * p 87 footnote indicators in text **//come after all other punctuation.// | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | * pp 81-3 the bolded " | ||
+ | * why is only one side of the spreads numbered? | ||
+ | * i like the idea of the formatting of the ingredients sections, but somehow the combination of ingredients with and without preceding quantities looks confusing to me… especially where one ingredient listing spills over into multiple lines. | ||