Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
open_sauces_errata [2010-04-26 23:29] 203.26.122.12open_sauces_errata [2010-04-27 10:24] nik
Line 38: Line 38:
   * <del>pp 60-61. needs page number</del>   * <del>pp 60-61. needs page number</del>
   * pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work"   * pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work"
 +  * <del>p 83 change "ginger soup" heading font</del> 
 +  * <del>p 87 footnote indicators in text **come after all other punctuation.** so ~</del> 
 +    * <del>"…events like the Flemish Primitives<sup>2</sup>."  --> "…Primitives**.<sup>2</sup>**"</del> 
 +    * <del>"(GC-MS)<sup>1</sup>." in this case i would put the number inside the brackets "(GC-MS <sup>1</sup>)." to make clear that it refers to the abbreviation and not the sentence as a whole.</del> 
 +  * <del>"golgappa" or "Gol Gappa"</del> i've used "Gol Gappa"(see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panipuri) 
 +  * <del>pp 81-3 the bolded "why" repeated in each section here looks a bit weird to me.</del> now opens with **"This dessert"** 
 +  * <del>why is only one side of the spreads numbered?</del> both facing pages should be numbered except on graphic only spreads. 
 +  * i like the idea of the formatting of the ingredients sections, but somehow the combination of ingredients with and without preceding quantities looks confusing to me… especially where one ingredient listing spills over into multiple lines. -- please add details/suggestions/examples 
  
  • open_sauces_errata.txt
  • Last modified: 2014-07-03 16:04
  • by nik