Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
open_sauces_errata [2010-04-27 10:24] – nik | open_sauces_errata [2014-07-03 16:04] (current) – nik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | === open sauces tasks/ | + | ==== open sauces tasks/ |
- | items marked as < | ||
- | === draft #1 -> #14 === | + | ==== errata for first edition ==== |
- | * compressed into draft #16 | + | * page 89 "15ml tablesppons of ginger" |
- | === draft #18 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100413.pdf) === | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * < | ||
- | |||
- | === still waiting... === | ||
- | * check all logos | ||
- | * check E numbers | ||
- | * check chemical notation | ||
- | * check footnotes | ||
- | * check IPA for ' | ||
- | * check capitalisation & italic of 'Miel beton' | ||
- | * i think i checked this, so it should simply be as indicated in the final plain text versions. | ||
- | * map for feral trade coffee -> double gold recipe | ||
- | * check chinese in ginger soup recipe | ||
- | * well, as i mentioned by email a while ago, there is nothing in the characters that suggests they // | ||
- | * check urls for accurcy & consistency | ||
- | * check footnote consistency | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | === draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) === | ||
- | * changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions | ||
- | * pp76. recipe layout/ | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | === draft #26 (aka open_sauces_draft.20100425.pdf) === | ||
- | |||
- | * pp 12-13. taste of brussels. if possible this page should look a bit archaic, with images from old herbaria and/or beer ads (see email for examples) | ||
- | * pp 18-19. frills on parentheses very good on this page. background on this page could be a bit dusty (dukkah dust) | ||
- | * pp 49. change amounts in recipe to relative amounts in Stuffed Gol Gappa Balls (see email) | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work" | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * < | ||
- | * i like the idea of the formatting of the ingredients sections, but somehow the combination of ingredients with and without preceding quantities looks confusing to me… especially where one ingredient listing spills over into multiple lines. -- please add details/ | ||