Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
open_sauces_errata [2010-04-27 10:27] – nik | open_sauces_errata [2010-09-23 13:34] – 83.101.5.51 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== draft #18 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100413.pdf) === | === draft #18 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100413.pdf) === | ||
- | * <del>pp 61. Remove subhead ' | + | * <del>p 61. Remove subhead ' |
- | * <del>pp 55. include author name beneath title.</ | + | * <del>p 55. include author name beneath title.</ |
- | + | ||
- | === still waiting... === | + | |
- | * check all logos | + | |
- | * check E numbers | + | |
- | * check chemical notation | + | |
- | * check footnotes | + | |
- | * check IPA for ' | + | |
- | * check capitalisation & italic of 'Miel beton' | + | |
- | * i think i checked this, so it should simply be as indicated in the final plain text versions. | + | |
- | * map for feral trade coffee -> double gold recipe | + | |
- | * check chinese in ginger soup recipe | + | |
- | * well, as i mentioned by email a while ago, there is nothing in the characters that suggests they // | + | |
- | * check urls for accurcy & consistency | + | |
- | * check footnote consistency | + | |
=== draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) === | === draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) === | ||
* changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions | * changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions | ||
- | * pp76. recipe layout/ | + | * < |
=== draft #26 (aka open_sauces_draft.20100425.pdf) === | === draft #26 (aka open_sauces_draft.20100425.pdf) === | ||
- | * pp 12-13. taste of brussels. if possible this page should look a bit archaic, with images from old herbaria and/or beer ads (see email for examples) | + | * <del>pp 12-13. taste of brussels. if possible this page should look a bit archaic, with images from old herbaria and/or beer ads (see email for examples)</ |
- | * pp 18-19. frills on parentheses very good on this page. background on this page could be a bit dusty (dukkah dust) | + | * <del>pp 18-19. frills on parentheses very good on this page.</ |
- | * pp 49. change amounts in recipe to relative amounts in Stuffed Gol Gappa Balls (see email) | + | * <del>pp 49. change amounts in recipe to relative amounts in Stuffed Gol Gappa Balls (see email)</ |
* < | * < | ||
* < | * < | ||
- | * pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work" | + | * <del>pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work"</ |
* < | * < | ||
* < | * < | ||
Line 46: | Line 32: | ||
* < | * < | ||
* i like the idea of the formatting of the ingredients sections, but somehow the combination of ingredients with and without preceding quantities looks confusing to me… especially where one ingredient listing spills over into multiple lines. -- please add details/ | * i like the idea of the formatting of the ingredients sections, but somehow the combination of ingredients with and without preceding quantities looks confusing to me… especially where one ingredient listing spills over into multiple lines. -- please add details/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === draft #31 === | ||
+ | * document-wide. < | ||
+ | * pp 4-7 < | ||
+ | * p 7. < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * heading "Note to the readers on how to get involved" | ||
+ | * p 18. < | ||
+ | * p 25. < | ||
+ | * p 28. < | ||
+ | * p 41. < | ||
+ | * pp 42-43. < | ||
+ | * p 47. < | ||
+ | * p 49. < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * p 56. < | ||
+ | * p 61. < | ||
+ | * p 74. < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | |||
+ | === draft #37 (aka the big final reference shindig) === | ||
+ | some quotes still don't have full reference data attached, but in these few cases i think we can get away with it (and in any case no data was supplied by the authors). | ||
+ | |||
+ | the references not corrected below can be left as they are. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * p 18. < | ||
+ | * p 23. < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * p 42. < | ||
+ | * p 56. < | ||
+ | * p 61. < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | |||
+ | === draft #41 === | ||
+ | * p 10. **Q.** is it ok for an ellipsis (for quotation elision) to follow a fullstop? i.e. "human sex hormones. … From the Middle Ages" | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Author' | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * p 68. | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Q:** are you going to keep the blue highlighting for the urls? it looks kind of full-on to me. also, urls listed as references/ | ||
+ | * by the way, why don't you bite the bullet and just give the sourcing sections ragged margins??? just look at the paragraphs on p. 11 (also 37, etc.) :-/ ok.ok.ok. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Author' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * contents / recipes | ||
+ | * The table of contents mentions " | ||
+ | * as the fonts of these titles are set in orange on the individual pages, also put the referring numbers on the table of contents in orange (they are now in blue)? | ||
+ | * in general: put every url in blue, the difference between "in text" and "out of text" is unclear, now it looks like somewhere the marking has been forgotten | ||
+ | * in general: provide caption/ | ||
+ | * p.4: remove ">>" | ||
+ | * p.6: remove the link to opensauces as it mentioned also on p.7 | ||
+ | * pp.10-11: accolades: there are a lot of them! maybe only use " | ||
+ | * p.10: put also the wikipedia url in blue? | ||
+ | * P.14: remove ">>" | ||
+ | * p.19: remove closing accolade as there is no extra line with additional info | ||
+ | * pp.22-23: place " | ||
+ | * pp.24-25: | ||
+ | * pp.26-27: remove closing accolades everywhere? | ||
+ | * pp.28-29: remove closing accolade? | ||
+ | * p.34-35: why not add the drawing of P31 on 34? The page now looks so empty. Remove closing accolades? | ||
+ | * p.36-37: and use the drawing of p 30 on p 37? A lot of emptiness as well here. Remove closing accolades on p. 36 and use a smaller one for p.37? | ||
+ | * p.41: Maybe put title in bold " | ||
+ | * p.43: put floating " | ||
+ | * p.49: put floating " | ||
+ | * p.56: remove closing accolades? | ||
+ | * p.57: put floating " | ||
+ | * p.69: remove closing accolades? | ||
+ | * pp.72-73: remove the entire right column " | ||
+ | * p.75: remove closing accolades? | ||
+ | * pp.76-77: remove closing accolades? | ||
+ | * pp.86-87: | ||
+ | * pp.90-91: beautiful drawings, but not sure where this refers to? | ||
+ | * p.93: remove closing accolades? | ||
+ | * Sneha Solanki bio update | ||
+ | |||
+ | Some thoughts [tj]: | ||
+ | * p.67: the column furthest to the right starts one line lower than the one to its left | ||
+ | * p.82: “I dared tasting it…” change to “I dared taste it” | ||
+ | * p.93: “Chop mint leaves very fine” change fine to finely | ||
+ | * pp. 94-95: spread 14? To add? | ||
+ | * p.96: “First Edition Published by FoAM, Brussels, Belgium. 2009” change to 2010? | ||
+ | * Seemed to be some other spacing issues but when I copied the text into Word, there was just one space between the words (rather than what seemed to be none or several). I can put these up if necessary. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === still waiting... === | ||
+ | * check all logos | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * check chemical notation | ||
+ | * only one or two of these have ended up in the publication, | ||
+ | * check footnotes | ||
+ | * check IPA for ' | ||
+ | * check capitalisation & italic of 'Miel beton' | ||
+ | * i think i checked this, so it should simply be as indicated in the final plain text versions. | ||
+ | * map for feral trade coffee -> double gold recipe | ||
+ | * check chinese in ginger soup recipe | ||
+ | * well, as i mentioned by email a while ago, there is nothing in the characters that suggests they // | ||
+ | * check urls for accurcy & consistency | ||
+ | * check footnote consistency | ||
+ | * the few footnotes there are now look fine. maybe consider using a numeral in sneha' | ||
+ | * check libarynth and foam -> opensauces.cc urls | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | |||