Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- open_sauces_errata [2010-08-10 15:16] – 83.101.5.51
+++ open_sauces_errata [2010-09-07 06:59] – 83.101.5.51
@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 === draft #41 ===
   * p 10. **Q.** is it ok for an ellipsis (for quotation elision) to follow a fullstop? i.e. "human sex hormones. … From the Middle Ages"
+=== Author's Proof #01 ===
+  * p 34. replace period with comma after "The Big Fat Duck Cookbook"
+  * <del>p 53. bulleted list is wonky</del>
+  * p 87. references: replace hyphens with colons for consistency
+  * **Q:** are you going to keep the blue highlighting for the urls? it looks kind of full-on to me. also, urls listed as references/further reading have no special formatting, but urls in the sourcing sections do. in the "further reading" section on p. 61, the styling is kind of mixed. wouldn't this be better if made consistent, i.e. //all// urls in blue? **A:** the blue strike probably won't stay, it's there to make sure we haven't missed ny inline urls.
+  * by the way, why don't you bite the bullet and just give the sourcing sections ragged margins??? just look at the paragraphs on p. 11 (also 37, etc.) :-/ ok.ok.ok.
 === still waiting... ===