Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
open_sauces_errata [2010-08-10 15:16] – 83.101.5.51open_sauces_errata [2010-09-07 13:31] – nik
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 === draft #18 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100413.pdf) === === draft #18 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100413.pdf) ===
-  * <del>pp 61. Remove subhead 'Notes' and set as notes for consistency with other articles (eg. pp41, pp86-87)</del> +  * <del>p 61. Remove subhead 'Notes' and set as notes for consistency with other articles (eg. pp41, pp86-87)</del> 
-  * <del>pp 55. include author name beneath title.</del>+  * <del>p 55. include author name beneath title.</del>
  
  
 === draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) === === draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) ===
   * changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions   * changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions
-  * pp76. recipe layout/formatting+  * p 76. recipe layout/formatting
  
  
Line 78: Line 78:
 === draft #41 === === draft #41 ===
   * p 10. **Q.** is it ok for an ellipsis (for quotation elision) to follow a fullstop? i.e. "human sex hormones. … From the Middle Ages"    * p 10. **Q.** is it ok for an ellipsis (for quotation elision) to follow a fullstop? i.e. "human sex hormones. … From the Middle Ages" 
 +
 +=== Author's Proof #01 ===
 +  * <del>p 15. remove "Result" subhead at author's request"</del>
 +  * <del>p 23. missing "About" subhead</del>
 +  * p 34. replace period with comma after "The Big Fat Duck Cookbook"
 +  * <del>p 46. update urls at author's request</del>
 +  * <del>p 53. bulleted list is wonky</del>
 +  * <del>p 67. "goods in current circulation" -> "goods in recent circulation"</del>
 +  * p 68.
 +    * <del>quote -> italicize</del> correct?
 +    * <del>'Adversely' -> 'Conversely'</del>
 +    * <del>'It intentionally relates' -> 'It relates'</del>
 +    * <del>'too coarsely constituted' -> 'ground too coarsely'</del>
 +  * <del>p 87. references: replace hyphens with colons for consistency</del>
 +
 +  * **Q:** are you going to keep the blue highlighting for the urls? it looks kind of full-on to me. also, urls listed as references/further reading have no special formatting, but urls in the sourcing sections do. in the "further reading" section on p. 61, the styling is kind of mixed. wouldn't this be better if made consistent, i.e. //all// urls in blue? **A:** the blue strike probably won't stay, it's there to make sure we haven't missed ny inline urls.
 +  * by the way, why don't you bite the bullet and just give the sourcing sections ragged margins??? just look at the paragraphs on p. 11 (also 37, etc.) :-/ ok.ok.ok.
  
 === still waiting... === === still waiting... ===
  • open_sauces_errata.txt
  • Last modified: 2014-07-03 16:04
  • by nik