Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
open_sauces_errata [2010-09-08 16:25] – 83.101.5.51open_sauces_errata [2010-09-21 10:08] – 83.101.5.51
Line 96: Line 96:
   * by the way, why don't you bite the bullet and just give the sourcing sections ragged margins??? just look at the paragraphs on p. 11 (also 37, etc.) :-/ ok.ok.ok.   * by the way, why don't you bite the bullet and just give the sourcing sections ragged margins??? just look at the paragraphs on p. 11 (also 37, etc.) :-/ ok.ok.ok.
  
 +=== Author's Proof #2 ===
 +
 +  * contents / recipes
 +    * The table of contents mentions "recipe" before the recipe titles: i think it would be clearer for the user/browser if the word "recipe" would also be mentioned on every single recipe page (10, 16, 26, 34, 42, 48, 56, 62, 68, 74, 82, 88, 92)
 +    * as the fonts of these titles are set in orange on the individual pages, also put the referring numbers on the table of contents in orange (they are now in blue)?
 +  * in general: put every url in blue, the difference between "in text" and "out of text" is unclear, now it looks like somewhere the marking has been forgotten
 +  * in general: provide caption/context info for the double illustration pages?
 +  * p.4: remove ">>" sign, as it used differently elsewhere in the text (see p.32-33, i think here it makes perfect sense and is used in the best way)
 +  * p.6: remove the link to opensauces as it mentioned also on p.7
 +  * pp.10-11: accolades: there are a lot of them! maybe only use "closing accolades" in case of extra lines and keep to this also in the rest of the publication, as for E418 and Lecithin on p 10 and for Sucre and Glice on p.11, but not in the lower paragraph on Beetroot Crisps?
 +  * p.10: put also the wikipedia url in blue?
 +  * P.14: remove ">>" sign, as it used differently elsewhere in the text
 +  * p.19: remove closing accolade as there is no extra line with additional info
 +  * pp.22-23: place "About" alinea on p. 22 in stead of  23 accompanied by ">>" ?
 +  * pp.24-25:  place "About" alinea on p. 24 in stead of 25 accompanied by ">>" ?
 +  * pp.26-27: remove closing accolades everywhere?
 +  * pp.28-29: remove closing accolade?
 +  * p.34-35: why not add the drawing of P31 on 34? The page now looks so empty. Remove closing accolades?
 +  * p.36-37: and use the drawing of p 30 on p 37? A lot of emptiness as well here. Remove closing accolades on p. 36 and use a smaller one for p.37?
 +  * p.41: Maybe put title in bold "Please try this at home?"
 +  * p.43: put floating "agar-agar" paragraph below recipe and close with accolade?
 +  * p.49: put floating "Notes"  below recipe and close with accolade?
 +  * p.56: remove closing accolades?
 +  * p.57: put floating "sodium" paragraph below recipe and close with accolade, remove the rest of the closing accolades and use them for Xanthan and Gluco? 
 +  *  p.69: remove closing accolades?
 +  * pp.72-73: remove the entire right column "about" on p 73 to left column on p 72 and shift the rest of the columns to the right? use the ">>" as it used on p.32-33?
 +  * p.75: remove closing accolades?
 +  * pp.76-77: remove closing accolades?
 +  * pp.86-87:   remove the entire right column "about" on p 87 to left column on p 86 and shift the rest of the columns to the right? use the ">>" as it used on p.32-33?
 +  * pp.90-91: beautiful drawings, but not sure where this refers to?
 +  * p.93: remove closing accolades? 
 +  * Sneha Solanki bio update
 +  * 
 === still waiting... === === still waiting... ===
   * check all logos   * check all logos
-  * check E numbers (either wikipedia or 'de essenties' for reference)+  * <del>check E numbers (either wikipedia or 'de essenties' for reference)</del>
   * check chemical notation   * check chemical notation
     * only one or two of these have ended up in the publication, no? the one i found looked alright.     * only one or two of these have ended up in the publication, no? the one i found looked alright.
Line 112: Line 145:
     * the few footnotes there are now look fine. maybe consider using a numeral in sneha's (even though there's just the one footnote) to keep it consistent with bernard's article.     * the few footnotes there are now look fine. maybe consider using a numeral in sneha's (even though there's just the one footnote) to keep it consistent with bernard's article.
   * check libarynth and foam -> opensauces.cc urls   * check libarynth and foam -> opensauces.cc urls
-  * quote references. eg. "—Herbert Spencer in The Big Fat Duck Cookbook (Bloomsburry, 2008)" or "—F. Adria, J. Soler, A. Adria. El Bulli Books 2003. Rte. (El Bulli S.L., 2005)" i prefer the first.+  * <del>quote references. eg. "—Herbert Spencer in The Big Fat Duck Cookbook (Bloomsburry, 2008)" or "—F. Adria, J. Soler, A. Adria. El Bulli Books 2003. Rte. (El Bulli S.L., 2005)" i prefer the first.</del>
  
  
  • open_sauces_errata.txt
  • Last modified: 2014-07-03 16:04
  • by nik