Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- open_sauces_errata [2010-09-08 17:05] – 83.101.5.51
+++ open_sauces_errata [2010-10-03 10:58] – nik
@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
   * **Q:** are you going to keep the blue highlighting for the urls? it looks kind of full-on to me. also, urls listed as references/further reading have no special formatting, but urls in the sourcing sections do. in the "further reading" section on p. 61, the styling is kind of mixed. wouldn't this be better if made consistent, i.e. //all// urls in blue? **A:** the blue strike probably won't stay, it's there to make sure we haven't missed ny inline urls.
-  * by the way, why don't you bite the bullet and just give the sourcing sections ragged margins??? just look at the paragraphs on p. 11 (also 37, etc.) :-/ ok.ok.ok.
+  * <del>by the way, why don't you bite the bullet and just give the sourcing sections ragged margins??? just look at the paragraphs on p. 11 (also 37, etc.) :-/ ok.ok.ok.</del>
+=== Author's Proof #02 ===
+  * contents / recipes
+    * The table of contents mentions "recipe" before the recipe titles: i think it would be clearer for the user/browser if the word "recipe" would also be mentioned on every single recipe page (10, 16, 26, 34, 42, 48, 56, 62, 68, 74, 82, 88, 92)
+    * as the fonts of these titles are set in orange on the individual pages, also put the referring numbers on the table of contents in orange (they are now in blue)?
+  * <del>in general: put every url in blue, the difference between "in text" and "out of text" is unclear, now it looks like somewhere the marking has been forgotten</del>
+  * in general: provide caption/context info for the double illustration pages?
+  * <del>p.4: remove ">>" sign, as it used differently elsewhere in the text (see p.32-33, i think here it makes perfect sense and is used in the best way)</del>
+  * p.6: remove the link to opensauces as it mentioned also on p.7
+  * <del>pp.10-11: accolades: there are a lot of them! maybe only use "closing accolades" in case of extra lines and keep to this also in the rest of the publication, as for E418 and Lecithin on p 10 and for Sucre and Glice on p.11, but not in the lower paragraph on Beetroot Crisps?</del>
+  * <del>p.10: put also the wikipedia url in blue?</del>
+  * P.14: remove ">>" sign, as it used differently elsewhere in the text. **A** note sure what is "different" here. the '>>' indicated the start of an article/text.
+  * <del>pp.22-23: place "About" alinea on p. 22 in stead of 23 accompanied by ">>"?</del> - doesn't work visually. i'll keep it as it is.
+  * <del>pp.24-25:  place "About" alinea on p. 24 in stead of 25 accompanied by ">>"?</del> - doesn't work visually. i'll keep it as it is.
+  * p.34-35: why not add the drawing of P31 on 34? The page now looks so empty.
+  * p.36-37: and use the drawing of p 30 on p 37? A lot of emptiness as well here. Remove closing accolades on p. 36 and use a smaller one for p.37?
+  * p.41: Maybe put title in bold "Please try this at home?"
+  * p.43: put floating "agar-agar" paragraph below recipe and close with accolade?
+  * p.49: put floating "Notes"  below recipe and close with accolade?
+  * p.57: put floating "sodium" paragraph below recipe and close with accolade, remove the rest of the closing accolades and use them for Xanthan and Gluco?
+  * pp.72-73: remove the entire right column "about" on p 73 to left column on p 72 and shift the rest of the columns to the right? use the ">>" as it used on p.32-33?
+  * pp.86-87: remove the entire right column "about" on p 87 to left column on p 86 and shift the rest of the columns to the right? use the ">>" as it used on p.32-33?
+  * pp.90-91: beautiful drawings, but not sure where this refers to?
+  * Sneha Solanki bio update
+Some thoughts [tj]:
+  * p.67: the column furthest to the right starts one line lower than the one to its left
+  * p.82: “I dared tasting it…” change to “I dared taste it”
+  * p.93: “Chop mint leaves very fine” change fine to finely
+  * pp. 94-95: spread 14? To add
+  * Seemed to be some other spacing issues but when I copied the text into Word, there was just one space between the words (rather than what seemed to be none or several). I can put these up if necessary.
 === still waiting... ===