Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- parn:dilzio [2013-04-23 12:46] – nik
+++ parn:dilzio [2013-04-23 12:51] – nik
@@ Line 149: / Line 149: @@
 --druko
-====Exclusive interview featuring three patabotanists====
+====Interview featuring three patabotanists====
 Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:46 pm
@@ Line 157: / Line 157: @@
 Magnus Dieter: Where are you from and why did you come here?
-Alchemilla Lily Umiliata: We are researchers and generalists from a parallel reality where plants and humans communicate and collaborate through sentient technology. We became interested in this world when we stumbled on an article on the internet about [[:hpi_ii|human-plant communication]] here, or rather human-plant non-communication, as it turns out - the article mainly discussed the possibilities. And it did seem clear that there were a lot of possibilities, but also how far things had to go before a real collaboration could exist.
+Alchemilla Lily Umiliata: We are researchers and generalists from a parallel reality where plants and humans communicate and collaborate through sentient technology. We became interested in this world when we stumbled on an article on the internet about [[:groworld_hpi_ii|human-plant communication]] here, or rather human-plant non-communication, as it turns out - the article mainly discussed the possibilities. And it did seem clear that there were a lot of possibilities, but also how far things had to go before a real collaboration could exist.
 Mandrago Fraser Mithrodin: You understand that both our realities share the internet; I don't know why. It's quite old-fashioned that way. I'm rarely on the internet myself, it gets boring.
@@ Line 191: / Line 191: @@
 Part II of this interview will follow shortly.
+----
+Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:54 pm
+I saw this when it first came out in eDit_C#. It struck me as being a rather poor piece of journalism at the time, and though I grant that it is perhaps more "on topic" in this forum than it ever was in the magazine, my opinion remains unchanged.
+There are so many flaws here that it is hard to know where to begin. The interviewer fails to elicit the context, which remains unclear throughout; it's virtually impossible to get a picture of who (or what?) these people are and what they are actually doing - or why this is even important to us in the first place. (And after all, it hardly takes much to suspect that the whole interview is mere fabrication anyway.)
+In sum: why would anyone waste time on this? m(
+--uncookedprecaution
+----
+Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:58 pm
+Thank you for your comments, uncookedprecaution.
+    uncookedprecaution wrote:The interviewer fails to elicit the context, which remains unclear throughout; it's virtually impossible to get a picture of who (or what?) these people are and what they are actually doing
+Maybe if you followed some of the links (or read some of the other forum posts) you might find some 'context'.
+Re: fabrication, I suggest you contact the magazine directly for further clarification.
+--Motionless Detector
+----
+Thu Oct 11, 2012 3:52 pm
+    Motionless Detector wrote:Re: fabrication, I suggest you contact the magazine directly for further clarification.
+When your magisterial words, I was my mouth fell right open. Far away! Your powerful and effective ideas took me on the next great wave and earnestly wish triumph in some latest presidential elections. Your support given to you I tremble with awe. This time I trust with all my soul right and sincere collaborations after reading your soulful mind eye, it being!