Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| project_groworld_general_compost_artscience [2012-02-20 21:46] – cocky | project_groworld_general_compost_artscience [2012-02-20 21:46] – cocky | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ------------------------ | ------------------------ | ||
| - | === ludmila | + | == ludmila == |
| After talking to Marloes and Mischa yesterday I came up with this Dutch documentary on a whole new thinking of design, recycling and the future of food. The theory [[cradle_to_cradle]] is based on 0% trash generation, 100% compostation of objects we produce, buy and throw away. According to the architect William McDonough and the chemist Michael Baumgart (the two authors of the cradle-to-cradle ideology) things have to go faster, easier and cleaner to the environment. Recycling as we know today isn't real, it's actually downcycling. Recycling is only true when things are really useful for the environment and as good enough for us as if was brand new. | After talking to Marloes and Mischa yesterday I came up with this Dutch documentary on a whole new thinking of design, recycling and the future of food. The theory [[cradle_to_cradle]] is based on 0% trash generation, 100% compostation of objects we produce, buy and throw away. According to the architect William McDonough and the chemist Michael Baumgart (the two authors of the cradle-to-cradle ideology) things have to go faster, easier and cleaner to the environment. Recycling as we know today isn't real, it's actually downcycling. Recycling is only true when things are really useful for the environment and as good enough for us as if was brand new. | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| ------------------- | ------------------- | ||
| - | === maja === | + | == maja == |
| I mentioned **critical design as a method** to encourage a visual discussion with an audience. Here's a good description of it: | I mentioned **critical design as a method** to encourage a visual discussion with an audience. Here's a good description of it: | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
| ---------------------- | ---------------------- | ||
| - | === cocky === | + | == cocky == |
| **online books: | **online books: | ||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
| ------------------ | ------------------ | ||
| - | === theun === | + | == theun == |
| == some people: == | == some people: == | ||
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
| --------------------- | --------------------- | ||
| - | === claud === | + | == claud == |
| How plants collaborate against one enemy: | How plants collaborate against one enemy: | ||
| *http:// | *http:// | ||
| related: | related: | ||
87.210.211.132