Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
project_groworld_general_compost_artscience [2012-02-24 11:42] – cocky | project_groworld_general_compost_artscience [2012-02-24 21:28] – cocky | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== cocky == | == cocky == | ||
+ | Bruno Latour' | ||
+ | On the left we have the current political model. Nature is split off as something that requires the philosopher-scientist hero to go out into this hidden world of primary qualities and bring back precious knowledge. The natural world is set against culture as either a chaotic force that needs to be controlled (i.e. modernism) or mother nature is in balance and we need to become attuned to her laws so as not to destroy her and ourselves (Gaia spiritualism). We should not aim to marry culture and nature together, but to dissolve the distinction entirely. | ||
+ | On the right side of the diagram we can see what it means if we don’t split culture and nature and instead have a collective of non-human and human actants. The collective is in charge of collecting the multiplicity of associations between humans and non-humans. This is because the subject/ | ||
+ | |||
*http:// | *http:// | ||
A chamber is intended to be a powerful demonstration of **how plants act as the lungs of planet** Earth, providing all the oxygen that sustains us. | A chamber is intended to be a powerful demonstration of **how plants act as the lungs of planet** Earth, providing all the oxygen that sustains us. | ||
- | ** Orpheum frutescens** | + | The Flower |
*http:// | *http:// | ||
from BBC series How to Grow a Planet. full episode 1 http:// | from BBC series How to Grow a Planet. full episode 1 http:// | ||
- | the series is based on the book The Emerald Planet: How plants changed Earth' | + | the series is based on the book "The Emerald Planet: How plants changed Earth' |