This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| resilients:resilience [2012-04-12 14:43] – nik | resilients:resilience [2013-02-13 08:46] (current) – nik | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| in http:// | in http:// | ||
| - | ===other=== | + | === other metaphors, directions and questions |
| * http:// | * http:// | ||
| - | | + | |
| + | < | ||
| + | What I’m pointing at is that there’s an executive function in response to crisis: restore things to pre-crisis conditions using resilience models, or implement revolutionary change. Right now, what I’m not seeing in the dialogues about resilience that I’ve been exposed to is a clear discourse about resilience as an *alternative* to revolutionary change. I want to see a discourse about knowing when to make systems resilient and when to prime them for revolution. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | The term “resilience” is often held by some to be the holy grail of social qualities for all organisations. | ||
| + | </ | ||