Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision |
table_seating [2022-04-04 03:32] – nik | table_seating [2024-04-11 10:12] – [Strict] nik |
---|
| |
====Strict==== | ====Strict==== |
A strict version is an affine plane. Example 25 people in 5 tables of 5, Point set is Z_5 x Z_5,we take the tables to be the lines L(a,b)={(x,y)| y=ax+b} and L(a)={(a,y)| y in Z_5}, the sitting is a parallel class (the 5 lines with the same slope a), so we have 6 sittings, L(a,b) for a=0,1,2,3,4 and then the parallel class of L(a). | A strict version is an affine plane. Example 25 people in 5 tables of 5, Point set is $Z_5 * Z_5$, we take the tables to be the lines $L(a,b)={(x,y)| y=ax+b} and L(a)={(a,y)| y in Z_5}$, the sitting is a parallel class (the 5 lines with the same slope a), so we have 6 sittings, L(a,b) for a=0,1,2,3,4 and then the parallel class of L(a). |
| |
More generally we want a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_design#Resolvable_2-designs|resolvable 2-design]]. We want resolvable (v,k,1) designs. Resolvable is the parallelism. Maybe there is something like discrete hyperbolic geometry to deal with this, but we seem to have better combinatorial ideas below. | More generally we want a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_design#Resolvable_2-designs|resolvable 2-design]]. We want resolvable (v,k,1) designs. Resolvable is the parallelism. Maybe there is something like discrete hyperbolic geometry to deal with this, but we seem to have better combinatorial ideas below. |
| |
Table size 4: Resolvable (v,k,1)- 2-designs. | Table size 4: Resolvable (v,k,1)- 2-designs. |
[[https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-spectrum-of-resolvable-designs-with-block-size-Vasiga-Furino/364fb4a75a38493ed2c86fa3589adfee6d2714f5|This paper]] says that nessesary numerical conditions are sufficient except for a case that need not concern us. | [[https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-spectrum-of-resolvable-designs-with-block-size-Vasiga-Furino/364fb4a75a38493ed2c86fa3589adfee6d2714f5|This paper]] says that necessary numerical conditions are sufficient except for a case that need not concern us. |
| |
==== Lower Version==== | ==== Lower Version==== |