✎ the_animist_paradox [the libarynth]

You've loaded an old revision of the document! If you save it, you will create a new version with this data.

===The Animist Paradox===
by Nik Gaffney - position paper for '[[designing robotic artifacts]]' workshop at NordiCHI2010

Based on three assumptions; that we are living in a "robot cargo cult", that animism and materialism are incompatible, and that we need ways of better understanding contextually sensitive human-machine complexes if we are to successfully design semi-autonomous artefacts
We are building machines to live up to our expectations of how they should behave, based on what we have been told they can do. Pop culture, cinema, science fiction are thick with description, yet our artefacts are often created in "imitative rituals that are conducted without understanding the underlying cause of a phenomenon." We are living in a Robot Cargo Cult((Y. Fernaeus, et al. Are we living in a robot cargo cult?. (2009))).
The central claim of "Animism, Rinri, Modernization"((Naho KITANO. Animism, Rinri, Modernization; the Base of Japanese Robotics. ICRA 2007.)) is that an Animist perspective on robotics, is at odds with the Materialist assumption that a robotic subjectivity is realistic, achievable and substrate independent. The animist position suggests ethics as an essential part of robotic development, while a materialist perspective suggests a flexible, rewritable, moral software as something independent.

Conversely, in "Bots on The Ground"((Joel Garreau. Bots on The Ground. Washinton Post, Sunday, May 6, 2007.)), it seems that an imposed subjectivity, identity or intent is inevitable. Hyper-functionalist, mine clearing robots, in a war zone, become trusted companions of the soldiers that use them. Robots designed with no sense of character or personality are imbued with such characteristics by virtue of their involvement inn human activities.
These perspectives provide insight into what may be a deeper relation, a shared contextuality that is often absent in the design, development and deployment of robotic systems. What changes with a materialist to animist shift? Are there points of compatibility?((L. Steels. Talking Heads Experiment. 1998.)) how does this affect the design, engineering and use of robots or semi-autonomous artefacts?

There may be existing tools to help with this transition; for example, Panarchic((C.S. Holling. Panarchy. 1985.)) control systems can provide the designer with the possibility to model "evolving hierarchical systems with multiple interrelated elements", while Rosen Modeling Relations((R. Rosen. Anticipatory Systems. 1985.)) (or similar contextual modeling formalisms) may provide a theoretical grounding for highly context sensitive complex systems.

This suggests a series of shifts; from...
  - accuracy to quirks
  - repeatability to consistency
  - error to ambiguity
  - processing to play
  - control to emergence
  - mechanism to dynamism
  - fragility to redundancy
  - mono- to multi-
(…)

---
see also; [[category robotics]] [[project lirec]]

Please fill all the letters into the box to prove you're human. Please keep this field empty:

Edit summary

Note: By editing this page you agree to license your content under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International