Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
the_art_of_futuring [2019-02-23 09:51] nikthe_art_of_futuring [2019-03-12 11:41] maja
Line 7: Line 7:
   * https://fo.am/events/art-futuring-workshop/   * https://fo.am/events/art-futuring-workshop/
  
-==== Reading Extracts Etc. ==== +==== Techniques from the workshop ==== 
-  * various fragments from https://libarynth.org/futurist_fieldguide/start+ 
 +Experimented with a series of techniques to probe possible futures.  
 +The techniques included: 
 + 
 +=== Divination === 
 + 
 +Using [[http://superflux.in/index.php/and-now-for-something-completely-different/#|Instant Archetypes]] from Superflux: 
 + 
 +{{>https://vimeo.com/296869333}}\\  
 + 
 +<blockquote> a toolkit for anyone looking to open up possibilities, surface questions and untangle stubborn challenges. A reimagining of the timeless tropes of the Major Arcana for the 21st Century where the Fool is now the Consumer, the Chariot is a Drone, and the Moon is a Meme. </blockquote> 
 + 
 +=== Futuring card games === 
 + 
 +Learning to work with constraints, wild cards, Four Archetypal Futures and speculative artefacts 
 +  * [[https://www.kunsten.be/dossiers/internationaal-samenwerken-2/reframing-the-international/about-reframing-the-international#!|Reframing the International]] by Kunstenpunt 
 +  * [[https://situationlab.org/project/the-thing-from-the-future/|The Thing from the Future]] by Situation Lab.  
 +   * Print your own cards [[http://situationlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/FUTURETHING_Print-and-Play.pdf|here]] 
 +         
 +       
 +<blockquote> The Thing From The Future is an imagination game that helps players generate countless ideas for artifacts from the future; to amuse, delight, explore, and provoke. </blockquote> 
 + 
 + 
 +=== Asking questions === 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +Non-predictive strategy:  
 + 
 +4. KPUU (Known, Presumed, Unknown, Unknowable) 
 + 
 + 
 +Horizon scanning:  
 + 
 +5. Macro Trends/ Weak Signals 
 +6. Mapping change drivers into STEEP categories 
 +    (Social, Technological,Environmental, Economic, Political) 
 + 
 +7. Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) 
 + 
 +8. Dot-voting 
 + 
 +9. Ranking Critical Uncertainties 
 + 
 +10. Sociometry 
 + 
 +11. U process (presencing/silent reflection) 
 + 
 +12. Scenario building (alternative futures) 
 +    • 2x2 double uncertainty (GBN/Shell) 
 +    • scenario logic/scenario skeletons/plot elements 
 + 
 + 
 +Incasting: 
 + 
 +13. Answering core question from different vantage points 
 + 
 +14. Visualising scenario answers 
 + 
 + 
 +First-person scenarios: 
 + 
 +15. Closed eye visioning / mental time travel 
 + 
 +16. Personal backstory 
 + 
 + 
 +Prototyping 
 + 
 +17. Personal profile page (within scenario logic) 
 + 
 +18. Postcards from the future (tableau vivants) 
 + 
 +Preferred futures 
 + 
 +19. Appreciative Inquiry: Discovery phase (1 of 4) 
 + 
 +20. Theory of change: Outcomes Framework 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +Prehearsal / pre-enactment  
 + 
 +21. Backstories for preferred scenario 
 +22. Speculative Experience Design for concrete situation 
 + 
 + 
 +Open Space 
 +23. hosting workshop sessions 
 + 
 +Adaptive Action Cycle 
 +24. What? So what? Now What? 
 + 
 +25. Invocation 
 + 
 + 
 +==== Quotes/excerpts ====
  
 <blockquote>The general purpose of futures studies could be regarded as the provision of tools for the invention and pursuit of preferred futures; that is, the reconciliation of hopes and expectations. But it begins and ends, finally, with what any individual does in relation to those things. (…) [It is] the most potent political tool, to enable people to systematically redistribute the sensible at will and on their own behalf. (…) development and spread of futures tools rather than the outcomes of their application [is our concern].  <blockquote>The general purpose of futures studies could be regarded as the provision of tools for the invention and pursuit of preferred futures; that is, the reconciliation of hopes and expectations. But it begins and ends, finally, with what any individual does in relation to those things. (…) [It is] the most potent political tool, to enable people to systematically redistribute the sensible at will and on their own behalf. (…) development and spread of futures tools rather than the outcomes of their application [is our concern]. 
Line 41: Line 137:
 —Warren Ellis  —Warren Ellis 
 </blockquote> </blockquote>
 +
 +==== References ====
 +  * https://libarynth.org/futurist_fieldguide/start
 +  * https://libarynth.org/future_fabulators/background
 +  * https://www.zotero.org/groups/235804/future_fabulators/items/collectionKey/92CX4HZR
 +  * https://www.zotero.org/groups/235804/future_fabulators/items/collectionKey/I55D6MNC
 +  * {{ ::future_of_the_world_jenny_andersson_9780198814337_print.pdf |Future of The World}}
 +
  • the_art_of_futuring.txt
  • Last modified: 2024-04-02 12:33
  • by nik