Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
the_art_of_futuring [2019-03-12 14:44] – maja | the_art_of_futuring [2019-03-12 15:21] – maja | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | 8. Dot-voting | ||
- | 9. Ranking Critical Uncertainties | + | === Scenario building === |
- | 10. Sociometry | + | We used the 2x2 double uncertainty, |
- | 11. U process | + | The challenge of the method lies in its focus on scenario axes derived from critical uncertainties: |
+ | * reducing the number of change drivers to two critical uncertainties can create tension in participants | ||
+ | * the 2×2 matrix highlights ' | ||
- | 12. Scenario building (alternative futures) | + | {{ : |
- | • 2x2 double uncertainty (GBN/ | + | |
- | • scenario | + | |
+ | | ||
+ | Read more the GBN approach [[https:// | ||
- | Incasting: | + | You can find a slightly different description on the website of Infinite Futures (Wendy Schultz), alongside descriptions of other useful futuring tools and techniques: http:// |
- | 13. Answering core question from different vantage points | ||
- | 14. Visualising scenario answers | ||
+ | === Incasting === | ||
- | First-person | + | Incasting is about delving deeper into scenarios |
- | 15. Closed eye visioning / mental time travel | + | At the Art of Futuring workshop we used several approaches to incasting: |
- | 16. Personal backstory | + | == Answering the core question == |
+ | |||
+ | We asked the core question of the workshop from the vantage points of different scenarios. four very different answers. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Visualising scenario answers == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The answers were visualised as posters | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Closed eye visioning / mental time travel == | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Personal backstory | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: https:// | ||
Line 136: | Line 150: | ||
25. Invocation | 25. Invocation | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Dot-voting === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dot-voting is a facilitation method used to describe voting with dot stickers or markers. Dot-voting is widely used for making quick collaborative decisions. It is a quick and simple method for prioritize a long list of options. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Read more about dot-voting here: http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Sociometry === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sociometry is a technique to visualise social relationships. It can show underlying patterns of a group which can be difficult to surface through conversation. A sociometric exercise begins with a question that the group is required to answer by moving in the space and finding appropriate positions for all its members relative to each other. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Read more about sociometry [[:/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | See also the website of the Sociometry Training Network: http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === U process === | ||