Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
tweeting_things [2010-10-26 08:30] – rula.sayaftweeting_things [2010-10-26 09:14] – rula.sayaf
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 Facebook and Twitter are nowadays on top of social networking lists. People are drastically involved in socially networking, they put a lot of effort to keep it active and attract new people to their network. The exponential growth of such networking activities are justifiable due to the easiness and convenience of sharing personal data, images, thoughts, info and news ending with creating a rich exchange space. Talking about simplicity and straightforwardness of social networking in getting people to interact with robots with the possibility of ghost writers taking off the communication lead, Wizard of Oz methodology cannot help it but to keep popping. The similarity between [[http://lirec.eu/node/1760|WOZ]] and the ghost writing on the robot's behalf, suggests that probably mating the two approaches could end up in a framework to assess proposed intelligent robotic systems with users on a large scale in a more natural way of communication. Again, allowing people to interact and exchange communication in a non-monitored way will help in getting more natural and true responses from user/followers/friends as opposed to the restriction some users experience when participating in experiments within university or labs premises, which was the reason for creating the robot house to run experiments at [2]. Facebook and Twitter are nowadays on top of social networking lists. People are drastically involved in socially networking, they put a lot of effort to keep it active and attract new people to their network. The exponential growth of such networking activities are justifiable due to the easiness and convenience of sharing personal data, images, thoughts, info and news ending with creating a rich exchange space. Talking about simplicity and straightforwardness of social networking in getting people to interact with robots with the possibility of ghost writers taking off the communication lead, Wizard of Oz methodology cannot help it but to keep popping. The similarity between [[http://lirec.eu/node/1760|WOZ]] and the ghost writing on the robot's behalf, suggests that probably mating the two approaches could end up in a framework to assess proposed intelligent robotic systems with users on a large scale in a more natural way of communication. Again, allowing people to interact and exchange communication in a non-monitored way will help in getting more natural and true responses from user/followers/friends as opposed to the restriction some users experience when participating in experiments within university or labs premises, which was the reason for creating the robot house to run experiments at [2].
-Using this new approach is to be investigated further and incorporated in research+Could the giant beast, beautiful woman, starving beast or any other shape of Wizard of Oz be online with other disguises and interact to people as a prototype of an intelligent system? This new approach is promising and very easily deployed. However certain points listed in [1] should be clarified before further investigations, such as how exactly to incorporate robots in social networks within meaningful contexts? and how to research this approach and succeed in acquiring the aimed for results? 
 +These points were discussed in NordiCHI workshop on 16th Oct., 2010. Outcomes should bring more info about this approach feasibility and future plans. Till we have them keep watching for Wizards online who might not really be who you think they are  ...