| Next revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision |
| tweeting_things [2010-10-25 13:53] – created rula.sayaf | tweeting_things [2010-10-26 09:26] – rula.sayaf |
|---|
| =====Tweeting Things And Wizards Behind===== | =====Things Tweet, Can Wizards?===== |
| |
| | Living with robots and interactive companions involves sharing living spaces with robots in domestic environments, work, healthcare and even massively destructed environments. But what about the cyberspace and the internet? |
| | ====Tweeting Things==== |
| |
| ====Things Can Tweet==== | Nowadays, cyberspace is being sucked into our real lives to the extent that it is hard to separate both realities from each other. On daily basis, we are present in the cyberspace realms for considerable periods of time. This don't necessarily mean that we will lose contact with our intelligent companions. Unsurprisingly, existing in cyberspace embraces the existence of robots and other things online. Interactive companions are occasionally in cyberspace and online ready to interact, [[http://www.chatbots.org/|chat]] and respond to their fellow humans. |
| |
| Living with robots and interactive companions involves sharing living spaces with robots ranging from domestic environments to work, healthcare and even massively destructed environments. But what about the cyberspace and the internet? | [[http://www.twitter.com/|Twitter]] is a showcase where many "Things" tweet and moreover they have followers. Trees, cats, roasters,and robots update their followers with the latest actions they have been up to [1]. Nasa robot [[http://twitter.com/astrorobonaut|@AstroRobonaut]] tweets its news and shares opinions and even advices with its followers. Doing that, it seems that human writers are responding sometimes instead of the robot. They act as a ghost and interact with others within the robot's social network. |
| | Socially communicating with a robot is an appealing idea to have a free communication that offers significant insights about the way people react and / would like to communicate with robots. Human expectations about their interactive intelligent robot friend are easily spotted through these types of social networks through looking into what types of questions they ask, what topics they bring up and how they react to what the robot posts. |
| | |
| |
| We are present within the cyberspace for considerable periods of time. This don't necessarily mean that we will lose contact with our intelligent companions. Existing in cyberspace embraces the existence of robots and other things online. Interactive companions are occasionally in cyberspace online to interact, [[http://www.chatbots.org/|chat]] and respond to their fellow humans. | |
| |
| [[http://www.twitter.com/|Twitter]] is a showcase where many "Things" tweet and have followers. Trees, cats, roasters,and robots update their followers with their updates [1]. Nasa robot [[http://twitter.com/astrorobonaut|@AstroRobonaut]] posts its news and shares opinions with its friends. Human writers seem to be responding sometimes instead of the robot. They act as a ghost and interact within the robots social network. | |
| Socially communicating with this robot or any other robot offers significant insights about the way people react and / would like to communicate with a robot. Human expectations of their interactive robot friend are easily spotted through these types of social networks. | |
| | |
| ====Where is the Wizard of OZ?==== | ====Where is the Wizard of OZ?==== |
| |
| Facebook and Twitter are nowadays on top of social networking lists. People are drastically involved in their networking putting a lot of effort to keep active and attract new people to their network. The exponential growth of such networking activities are justifiable as it is very easy and convenient to share personal data, images, thoughts, info and news creating a rich exchange space. Talking about the simplicity and straightforwardness of this method in getting people to interact with robots through social networks while ghost writers take off the communication lead, Wizard of Oz methodology cannot help it but to keep popping. The similarity here between [[http://lirec.eu/node/1760|WOZ]] and the ghost writing on the robot's behalf, suggest that may be mating the two approaches could end up in a framework to assess proposed robotic systems with users on a large scale of the social network. | Facebook and Twitter are nowadays on top of social networking lists. People are drastically involved in socially networking, they put a lot of effort to keep it active and attract new people to their network. The exponential growth of such networking activities are justifiable due to the easiness and convenience of sharing personal data, images, thoughts, info and news ending with creating a rich exchange space. Talking about simplicity and straightforwardness of social networking in getting people to interact with robots with the possibility of ghost writers taking off the communication lead, Wizard of Oz methodology cannot help it but to keep popping. The similarity between [[http://lirec.eu/node/1760|WOZ]] and the ghost writing on the robot's behalf, suggests that probably mating the two approaches could end up in a framework to assess proposed intelligent robotic systems with users on a large scale in a more natural way of communication. Again, allowing people to interact and exchange communication in a non-monitored way will help in getting more natural and true responses from user/followers/friends as opposed to the restriction some users experience when participating in experiments within university or labs premises, which was the reason for creating the robot house to run experiments at [2]. |
| | Could the giant beast, beautiful woman, starving beast or any other shape of Wizard of Oz be online with other disguises and interact to people as a prototype of an intelligent system? This new approach is promising and very easily deployed. However certain points listed in [1] should be clarified before further investigations, such as how exactly to incorporate robots in social networks within meaningful contexts? and how to research this approach and succeed in acquiring the aimed for results? |
| | These points were discussed in NordiCHI workshop on 16th Oct., 2010. Outcomes should bring more info about this approach feasibility and future plans. Till we have them keep watching for Wizards online who might not really be who you think they are ... |
| | |
| |
| References: | References: |
| [1] http://www.sics.se/~majac/workshop2/position/HenrietteCramer.pdf | [1] http://www.sics.se/~majac/workshop2/position/HenrietteCramer.pdf |
| | [2] link to the unpublished robot house article :( |